2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.103008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and process simulation of hydrate-based CO2 capture from biogas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, understanding the formation process of this clathrate is fundamental to the engineering and scientific community. As such, CO 2 hydrates have been studied extensively recently. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, understanding the formation process of this clathrate is fundamental to the engineering and scientific community. As such, CO 2 hydrates have been studied extensively recently. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the weakly selective gas can also form hydrates, resulting in the lower selectivity of hydrate-based gas separation (HBGS) . In addition, HBGS requires separation operations at higher pressures, while some studies , have indicated that the compression energy consumption accounts for more than 50% of the total technological energy. Therefore, more in-depth research is needed to improve the mild experimental condition and separation selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al 19 studied shale gas CO 2 decarbonation process using [C 4 Mim][NTf 2 ], and the result indicated that the IL-based process can reduce over 42.8% of energy consumption. Li et al 20 simulated a biogas upgrading process using 5.0 wt % tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (TBAB), and the result illustrated that compared with the chemical absorption process, the energy consumption of their new upgrading process was 0.357 kW h/kg of biogas which was below that of chemical absorption process (0.582 kW h/kg of biogas) at CH 4 concentration from 67.00 to 97.00 mol %. Wang et al 21 modeled and simulated the process of CO 2 capture from flue gas using choline chloride/urea (1:2) deep eutectic solvent.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several operational parameters are optimized for the ammoniacontaining tail gas purification process, such as the number of total theoretical stage (N stage ), feed stage of semilean liquid (N solvent ), the ratio of splitted lean liquid to the total liquid flow rate (R SLT ), total absorbent flow ratio (F total ), absorption pressure (P ab ), pressure of flash 1 (P flash1 ), pressure of flash 2 (P flash2 ), and temperature of flash 1 (T flash2 ). The value ranges are [6,20] for N stage , [4,18] for N solvent , [0.2, 0.8] for R SLT , [5,40] The optimization of the purification process is shown in the following equation. The objective functions are the minimum of TPC and TPCOE and maximum of η eff .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%