2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Process Modelling Study of Integration of a Micro-turbine with an Amine Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agbonghae et al [106] performed simulations using a validated model of the Turbec T100 mGT integrated with an amine-based (MEA) chemical absorption plant in Aspen Plus. The optimum liquid/gas (L/G) ratios and the lean CO 2 loading for 90% capture is reported in Table 7 for flue gases of 3 to 8 mol% CO 2 content.…”
Section: Carbon Capture Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agbonghae et al [106] performed simulations using a validated model of the Turbec T100 mGT integrated with an amine-based (MEA) chemical absorption plant in Aspen Plus. The optimum liquid/gas (L/G) ratios and the lean CO 2 loading for 90% capture is reported in Table 7 for flue gases of 3 to 8 mol% CO 2 content.…”
Section: Carbon Capture Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical model has been validated against experimental data from Agbonghae et al [15] for two specific operating points, defined by their Liquid to Gas (L/G), which is the ratio between solvent and flue gas mass flow rates. The comparison between experimental and numerical results is provided in Table 1 for L/G ratios of 1.86 kg/kg and 3.77 kg/kg, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CC model has been validated against experimental values from Agbonghae et al [14] for two specific operating point, defined by their Liquid to Gas ratio (L/G), which is the ratio between solvent and flue gas mass flow rates. The comparison between experimental and numerical results is presented in Table 2 for L/G of 1.86 kg/kg and 3.77 kg/kg, respectively.…”
Section: Carbon Capture Modelling and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%