2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study on scratch performance of additively manufactured continuous carbon fibre reinforced polyamide 6 composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, it is also confirmed that the friction force is chiefly produced by the adhesion between the indenter tip and the sample under low normal load, and the different friction forces caused by the sliding of the indenter on carbon fiber and polymer matrix respectively are the main reasons for the fluctuation of friction coefficients (Figure 9). More specifically, mild fiber cracking and fiber breakage occurred in T‐ and AP‐orientations, while no observable carbon fiber failure apart from slight interfacial debonding was found in the P‐orientation under 1 N. This is due to the fact that when the scratch direction is parallel to the fiber orientation, the contact stress is smallest 49 . At the normal load of 2 N, stress concentration caused fiber end fracture in the P‐orientation, and fibers were obviously pressed into the matrix in T‐ and AP‐orientations under higher contact stress, which could still be conducive to the scratch resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, it is also confirmed that the friction force is chiefly produced by the adhesion between the indenter tip and the sample under low normal load, and the different friction forces caused by the sliding of the indenter on carbon fiber and polymer matrix respectively are the main reasons for the fluctuation of friction coefficients (Figure 9). More specifically, mild fiber cracking and fiber breakage occurred in T‐ and AP‐orientations, while no observable carbon fiber failure apart from slight interfacial debonding was found in the P‐orientation under 1 N. This is due to the fact that when the scratch direction is parallel to the fiber orientation, the contact stress is smallest 49 . At the normal load of 2 N, stress concentration caused fiber end fracture in the P‐orientation, and fibers were obviously pressed into the matrix in T‐ and AP‐orientations under higher contact stress, which could still be conducive to the scratch resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More specifically, mild fiber cracking and fiber breakage occurred in T-and AP-orientations, while no observable carbon fiber failure apart from slight interfacial debonding was found in the P-orientation under 1 N. This is due to the fact that when the scratch direction is parallel to the fiber orientation, the contact stress is smallest. 49 At the normal load of 2 N, stress concentration caused fiber end fracture in the P-orientation, and fibers were obviously pressed into the matrix in T-and AP-orientations under higher contact stress, which could still be conducive to the scratch resistance. Therefore, the friction coefficient and penetration depth were not dramatically increased, as seen in Figure 10A,B.…”
Section: Tribological Behavior Of Composites In Multiple Unidirection...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the curing temperature is directly increased without the use of stage heating, the reaction activity will be too high, and a large amount of polymerization heat is generated in a short time, so that the finished product will produce warping, bulging, porosity and other defects, so the prepreg usually will use stepped heating and solidification process. After the curing time is over, next step is the cooling stage [5].…”
Section: Properties and Technology Of Carbon Fiber Prepregmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFs are normally utilized in different forms, such as tows, woven and non-woven fabrics, and short fibers. [1][2][3][4] Short fibers are generally observed to be randomly oriented in polymer composites fabricated using regular molding conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%