2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study on bond strength between conventional concrete and Ultra High-Performance Concrete (UHPC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The investigation of [1] and [45] interesting to note that different approaches for modeling the interface were proposed in these works. [60] proposed equivalent beam elements to represent the bond behavior at the interface, instead [21] proposed to construct an interface material between the concrete layers used. Both models proved to be efficient and were validated by comparing their results with a three-point flexural test.…”
Section: Numerical Investigations (Fe Simulation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The investigation of [1] and [45] interesting to note that different approaches for modeling the interface were proposed in these works. [60] proposed equivalent beam elements to represent the bond behavior at the interface, instead [21] proposed to construct an interface material between the concrete layers used. Both models proved to be efficient and were validated by comparing their results with a three-point flexural test.…”
Section: Numerical Investigations (Fe Simulation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both models proved to be efficient and were validated by comparing their results with a three-point flexural test. It is important to note that these models reduce the overestimation of the bond performances as compared to "tie" models, in particular when either no surface preparation or no bonding agent are employed in certain cases [11,21]. Despite their good efficiency the aforementioned models are complex and risk to reduce the practical interest of the practitioner which tends to simplify its numerical simulations by using "tie" interface conditions [31,47].…”
Section: Numerical Investigations (Fe Simulation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide a generalized model, some bonded material properties should, however, be taken into account, in particular the elastic modulus, the shear modulus, the Poisson's ratio and the geometry of both bonded materials [18,19,20,31,55]. Consequently, the deformability of the overlay can…”
Section: Lateral Shear Bond Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general splitting tensile strength of the composite samples indicated an adequate strength level of bonding (>1.4 MPa), based on the quantitative bond strength quality proposed by Sprinkel and Ozyildirim [24]. Generally, improved bonding performance between UHPC and substrate NSC regardless of the moisture content of the substrate can be attributed to the good workability of UHPC which enhanced its capability to fill the pores on the substrate surface [14,25]. The good bond strength for the composite samples ensured that the ionic flow in the electrical migration test described next was related to the transport through the bulk material and cold-joint interface.…”
Section: Bond Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%