2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study of the behavior of a reinforced-earth wall subjected to a local load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analytical derivation was used as a basis for the choice of the value of c I and led to the adoption, in all the simulations presented here, of a unique value c I = 40 MPa/m. This value is similar to that used by Bourgeois et al [7] to discuss the behavior of an experimental wall (with a height of 3.5 m, which is significantly smaller than that of the wall discussed in the present work). Parametric studies (not detailed here) were carried out to investigate the influence of c I : results showed that, for large enough values of c I , the predicted behavior of the wall tends to be independent of this parameter.…”
Section: Use Of a Multiphase Approach To Account For The Ground-stripsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This analytical derivation was used as a basis for the choice of the value of c I and led to the adoption, in all the simulations presented here, of a unique value c I = 40 MPa/m. This value is similar to that used by Bourgeois et al [7] to discuss the behavior of an experimental wall (with a height of 3.5 m, which is significantly smaller than that of the wall discussed in the present work). Parametric studies (not detailed here) were carried out to investigate the influence of c I : results showed that, for large enough values of c I , the predicted behavior of the wall tends to be independent of this parameter.…”
Section: Use Of a Multiphase Approach To Account For The Ground-stripsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, when the wall movement is restricted or is less than the magnitude necessary to reach the limit condition, the mobilised earth pressures become greater than that of the limit state (Matsuzawa & Hazarika, 1996). Numerous experimental investigations (Bourgeois, Soyez, & Le Kouby, 2011;Chen & Chiu, 2008;Tejchman, 2011) have reported that the earth pressure is not only associated with the mode of wall movement but also with the magnitude developed. However, the earth pressure calculation still needs further development to take account of wall movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the backfill material, we have tested two values of the Young's modulus. The first one corresponds to 'typical' values of the modulus of a railway backfill, obtained on a full-scale experimental MSE wall [38,49]. The second value corresponds to a less stiff material, in which the shear wave velocity is lower, which is why it is referred to as a 'slow backfill material' in the following.…”
Section: Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%