2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2003.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study of topographic effects on deposition from two-dimensional, particle-driven density currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in sea-floor gradient would cause flow deceleration and reduce the current's capacity to transport its sediment load, especially the coarser-grained fraction. Therefore, a zone of enhanced deposition would be expected directly downstream of the slope break, as has been demonstrated by laboratory experiments (Mulder & Alexander 2001;Kubo 2004).…”
Section: Development Of Proximal Slope-related Faciesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The reduction in sea-floor gradient would cause flow deceleration and reduce the current's capacity to transport its sediment load, especially the coarser-grained fraction. Therefore, a zone of enhanced deposition would be expected directly downstream of the slope break, as has been demonstrated by laboratory experiments (Mulder & Alexander 2001;Kubo 2004).…”
Section: Development Of Proximal Slope-related Faciesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Let us remark that there are some discrepancies in the mathematical expression of the source terms φ η and φ j b . The expressions proposed in [18,20,23,30] are among the most used, but some variants may be found in [2,4,19]. We refer to these references for further details.…”
Section: Turbidity Current Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies have shown topographic obstacles generating increased deposition on both the stoss and lee sides. This is due to: a) disruption of turbulence on the stoss side, b) expansion of the flow on the lee side, c) stationary mixing vortices, and, d) general increased entrainment from exposure of the base of the flow to ambient shear mixing (Alexander and Morris, 1994;Morris and Alexander, 2003;Kubo, 2004;Al-Ja'aidi, 2006). In contrast, lofting gravity currents where lofting is triggered directly by the obstacle display a localised zone of increased deposition only on the stoss side.…”
Section: Comparison With Saline-particulate Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%