Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical studies on the warm deep drawing of an Al–Mg alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…location for Test-piece 1 and 2. However for Test-piece 3, the difference of the major strain between the numerical and experimental results may be attributed to the fact that a constant friction coefficient was used in the FE model, but the friction situation was changed in the experiment [3]. At t/tf=0.3, the punch starts to stretch the test-piece up from the center and cause little major strain in the center of the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…location for Test-piece 1 and 2. However for Test-piece 3, the difference of the major strain between the numerical and experimental results may be attributed to the fact that a constant friction coefficient was used in the FE model, but the friction situation was changed in the experiment [3]. At t/tf=0.3, the punch starts to stretch the test-piece up from the center and cause little major strain in the center of the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to that of rolling, for equibiaxial strain states, at a temperature of 250 ˚C and a forming speed of 20 mm/s, where t and t0 are the current and initial thickness. It is observed that the thickness variation of the specimen is not significantly dependent on direction [3].…”
Section: Experimental Programmementioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, in order to meet these requirements, new materials have been introduced in car body manufacturing, such as highstrength steels as well as aluminium alloys [2][3][4]. Nevertheless, these material are more prone to develop geometrical defects, namely springback [5]. Another important geometrical defect arising in sheet metal forming is the wrinkling behaviour, which results from the instability under compressive stresses [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%