2021
DOI: 10.1177/00202940211000377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical investigations on the effects of radius of curvature and longitudinal slope on the responses of curved bridges subject to seismic pounding

Abstract: Because of the irregular geometries, earthquake-induced adjacent curved bridge pounding may lead to more complex local damage or even collapse. The relevant research is mainly concentrated on the numerical analysis which lack experimental verification and discussion by changing of structural parameters. In this paper, a scaled three-dimensional numerical model of a curved bridge is established based on 3D contact friction theory for investigating the uneven distribution of pounding forces at the expansion join… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8 shows the time-history curve of the pounding force (Pf ) between the CRFB-FSP and AB bridge models under typical ground motions with PGA = 1.5 g. As Figure 8 shows, under the excitation of RSN55 and RSN292, the peak Pfs of CRFB-FSP were 5.9 kN and 13.2 kN; the pounding numbers were 4 and 3, respectively. The pounding may increase the damage risk and degree of the main beam and pier, which is consistent with the previous studies [14,21]. In addition, the pounding with the CRFB-FSP easily caused a persistent pounding, which may aggravate the damage of the bridge, especially for the seam joint at the pier bottom of the CRFB-FSP.…”
Section: Pounding Forcesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 8 shows the time-history curve of the pounding force (Pf ) between the CRFB-FSP and AB bridge models under typical ground motions with PGA = 1.5 g. As Figure 8 shows, under the excitation of RSN55 and RSN292, the peak Pfs of CRFB-FSP were 5.9 kN and 13.2 kN; the pounding numbers were 4 and 3, respectively. The pounding may increase the damage risk and degree of the main beam and pier, which is consistent with the previous studies [14,21]. In addition, the pounding with the CRFB-FSP easily caused a persistent pounding, which may aggravate the damage of the bridge, especially for the seam joint at the pier bottom of the CRFB-FSP.…”
Section: Pounding Forcesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results showed that for this type of long-span girder bridge, even if the vibration period of adjacent bridges is similar, pounding may occur due to the influence of the wave passage effect. In addition, Wang, Jiao, and Leila et al [13][14][15], also studied the pounding response of adjacent structures through numerical simulation. In view of the serious impact of pounding on the seismic performance of bridges, Jia and Zhou et al [16,17], suggested using dampers or adjusting the bearing parameters to avoid the pounding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experimental and numerical study by Jiao et al (2021) shows that unevenly distributed pounding forces can significantly increase the relative radial displacement of the deck corners of a curved bridge. The experimental data shows that the pounding force peak value and the number of pounding instances decrease if the distance between expansion joints increases, that the structures are more likely to collide under near-fault ground motions, and that the location of pounding mostly occurs at the corner of main beam, and the number of pounding instances inside the curve is larger.…”
Section: Contact Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the influence of pounding on the displacement response of the stiff abutments can be neglected. Jiao et al [29][30][31][32] carried out the shaking table tests and the numerical analysis to investigate the pounding effect of curved bridge. It was concluded that the maximum pounding force was related to the radius of curvature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%