43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Investigations of a Transverse Jet Interaction on a Missile Body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They have shorter response times and are effective at low dynamic pressures. Conventional surfaces may lack control authority, though the flow structure is very complex, and the control efficiency is difficult to predict due to the interaction of the jet with the external cross flow [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . The Ares I RoCS are located near the rear of the interstage, forward of the forward frustrum as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Vehicle and System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They have shorter response times and are effective at low dynamic pressures. Conventional surfaces may lack control authority, though the flow structure is very complex, and the control efficiency is difficult to predict due to the interaction of the jet with the external cross flow [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . The Ares I RoCS are located near the rear of the interstage, forward of the forward frustrum as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Vehicle and System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jet interaction literature focuses on the jet efficiency terms in forces and moments [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . The jet interaction rolling moment coefficient is calculated in Eq.…”
Section: Selection Of the Response Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pressure imbalance can be produced by the deployment of control surfaces Dupuis et al, 2004;Srulijes et al, 2004;Patel et al, 2002;Silton, 2004;Massey et al, 2004) or by the use of one or more pyrotechnical mechanisms judiciously distributed along the vehicle (Gnemmi & Seiler, 2000;Schäfer et al, 2001;Seiler et al, 2003;Gnemmi & Schäfer, 2005;Havermann et al, 2005;Yamanaka & Tanaka, 1996). In the case of supersonic projectiles, the major drawback to using the surface spreading technique is that large forces are involved i n t h e d e p l o y m e n t o f s u rf a c e s i n o r d e r t o overcome the very high pressures encountered at high velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, the ability to compare computational results with experimental data would be ideal, but no experimental data was available. The authors used as references a number of recent publications for other control jet interaction studies [6][7][8][9] of other missile reaction control systems analyses or experimental measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%