2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical investigation of obstacle effect on the performance of PEM fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Seen from Figure 5A‐C, the maximum velocity of side blockage flow field was up to 1.577 m s −1 , while the straight and side blockage alternating with straight flow channels were 0.426 and 1.270 m s −1 . Increasing flow rate and disturbance in the flow field could elevate the mass transfer capacity of PEMFC, which had been confirmed in previous work and many literatures 30,38 . Moreover, there was no obvious dead zone in the flow channel compared to top blocked flow channel.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seen from Figure 5A‐C, the maximum velocity of side blockage flow field was up to 1.577 m s −1 , while the straight and side blockage alternating with straight flow channels were 0.426 and 1.270 m s −1 . Increasing flow rate and disturbance in the flow field could elevate the mass transfer capacity of PEMFC, which had been confirmed in previous work and many literatures 30,38 . Moreover, there was no obvious dead zone in the flow channel compared to top blocked flow channel.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Increasing flow rate and disturbance in the flow field could elevate the mass transfer capacity of PEMFC, which had been confirmed in previous work and many literatures. 30,38 Moreover, there was no obvious dead zone in the flow channel compared to top blocked flow channel. The side blockages reduced the impact of vertical pressure variation on the proton exchange membrane, and the above mentioned factors would be beneficial for cell performance.…”
Section: Velocity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The current density of the fuel cell has been successfully increased by including a boss structure in the flow channel. Employing both numerical and experimental techniques, Ebrahimzadeh [21] investigated the impact of bosses in a two-way serpentine flow field on PEMFC efficiency. The bosses with dimensions of 1.5mm high x 3.6mm wide had the biggest impact on the voltage drop and current density of the PEMFC, according to their initial numerical simulations of the height and width of the bosses.…”
Section: Research Status Of Flow Field Structure After Optimization B...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tekli, ikili ve üçlü serpantin akış alanlarının kullanıldığı ve bunların akış dönüş noktalarının (dirsek) açılarının keskin ve geniş dönüşlü olarak karşılaştırıldığı çalışmada, kendilerinin önerdikleri akış alanı tipinin daha iyi performans verdiğini öne sürmüşlerdir. Akış alanlarının karşılaştırılması yöntemi, literatürde sıklıkla kullanılmakta olup, pek çok çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Awin ve Dukhan, serpantin akış alanına sahip klasik grafit BP ile alüminyum içine yerleştirilen alüminyum metal köpük BP'nin performanslarını karşılaştırmıştır [30].…”
Section: Akış Alanlarıunclassified
“…Günümüzde deneysel çalışmalarla birlikte analitik ve nümerik çalışmalar da gerçekleştirilebilmektedir. Deneysel çalışmalarda akış alanının görüntülenmesi zor olduğu için, araştırmacılar nümerik çalışmalarla akış alanlarını irdelemekte ve sonrasında deneysel analiz ile çalışmayı bütünleştirmektedirler [23,25,31,32]…”
Section: Deneysel çAlışma Düzeneğiunclassified