2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical investigation of nanofluids heat transfer characteristics for application in solar heat exchangers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reddy and Rao [71], Arulprakasajothi et al [74] and Abdolbaq et al [75] found that for TiO 2 nanofluids in intensely low concentrations, the Nu enhancements were higher than friction factor. In particular, Water (a) Nanoparticles in smaller diameters could bring out greater Brownian motion and result in higher average shear stress ratio and heat transfer effect (b) Size of particle plays greater roles in the enhancement of convection heat transfer than that in thermal conductivity (c) Particle migrations on the boundary layer can improve h of TiO 2 nanofluids Saha and Paul [90] Numerical Tube Turbulent Water (a) h was positively related to particle loading and Re, but negatively correlated to nanoparticle size (b) h was more affected by the particle size and Brownian motion than thermal conductivity of nanofluid Celata et al [91] Experimental and numerical Two-loop test rig Laminar to transitional Water (a) h was interactional with the parameters including k, q, l, cp, particle size, shape, loading and surfactants (b) h was affected by the initial values of particle size and the size of agglomeration occurring in the nanofluids He et al [20] Experimental Vertical tube Laminar to turbulent Water (a) The maximum enhancement of h was 12% for 1.18 vol.% particle loading in laminar flow regime (b) h increased with an increase in particle loading in both of laminar and turbulent flow regimes (c) Particle loading had greater role in turbulent flow regime (d) Particle size did not show great role in h Chen et al [92] Experimental Vertical tube Turbulent Water (a) The enhancements of the h at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.5 wt.% loading at x/D = 50.4 were respectively 11.8%, 23.5% and 24.9% (b) Enhancement of h by nanofluids was much higher than that of thermal conductivity (c) The tubular nanoparticles with large aspect ratios provided a higher enhancement of h than spherical particles Ebrahimnia-Bajestan et al [93] Experimental and numerical…”
Section: Influence Of Particle Loading and Rementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reddy and Rao [71], Arulprakasajothi et al [74] and Abdolbaq et al [75] found that for TiO 2 nanofluids in intensely low concentrations, the Nu enhancements were higher than friction factor. In particular, Water (a) Nanoparticles in smaller diameters could bring out greater Brownian motion and result in higher average shear stress ratio and heat transfer effect (b) Size of particle plays greater roles in the enhancement of convection heat transfer than that in thermal conductivity (c) Particle migrations on the boundary layer can improve h of TiO 2 nanofluids Saha and Paul [90] Numerical Tube Turbulent Water (a) h was positively related to particle loading and Re, but negatively correlated to nanoparticle size (b) h was more affected by the particle size and Brownian motion than thermal conductivity of nanofluid Celata et al [91] Experimental and numerical Two-loop test rig Laminar to transitional Water (a) h was interactional with the parameters including k, q, l, cp, particle size, shape, loading and surfactants (b) h was affected by the initial values of particle size and the size of agglomeration occurring in the nanofluids He et al [20] Experimental Vertical tube Laminar to turbulent Water (a) The maximum enhancement of h was 12% for 1.18 vol.% particle loading in laminar flow regime (b) h increased with an increase in particle loading in both of laminar and turbulent flow regimes (c) Particle loading had greater role in turbulent flow regime (d) Particle size did not show great role in h Chen et al [92] Experimental Vertical tube Turbulent Water (a) The enhancements of the h at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.5 wt.% loading at x/D = 50.4 were respectively 11.8%, 23.5% and 24.9% (b) Enhancement of h by nanofluids was much higher than that of thermal conductivity (c) The tubular nanoparticles with large aspect ratios provided a higher enhancement of h than spherical particles Ebrahimnia-Bajestan et al [93] Experimental and numerical…”
Section: Influence Of Particle Loading and Rementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to perform the CFD analysis first, Author has developed the solid model of the solar heat exchanger on the basis of geometry considered during the experimental analysis performed by Bajestan et.al [1].…”
Section: Development Cfd Model Of Heat Exchangermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the thermal conductivity of copper at room temperature is about 700 times greater than that of water, and about 3000 times greater than that of engine oil [8,9]. As a result, nanofluids, which are dilute suspensions of nano-size particles, have drawn much attention [10][11][12][13]. For instance, heat transfer of natural convection could be enhanced with a small volume fraction of nanoparticles [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%