2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical analysis of hybrid adhesively-bonded scarf joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8), leading to best results with a stronger but brittle adhesive because, under these conditions, the average stress at failure is higher. These findings agree with previous results [47], relating to hybrid scarf joints between aluminium and composites. On the other hand, the adhesives' ductility is not as important as in lap joints.…”
Section: Discussion On the Joint Strengthsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…8), leading to best results with a stronger but brittle adhesive because, under these conditions, the average stress at failure is higher. These findings agree with previous results [47], relating to hybrid scarf joints between aluminium and composites. On the other hand, the adhesives' ductility is not as important as in lap joints.…”
Section: Discussion On the Joint Strengthsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Figure 8 shows the energy stored in the samples until failure. The HJs were modeled with three-stage damage and cracking processes in: The adhesive layer: Modeled by cohesive elements [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19];The rivets: The ductile damage model with damage parameters [3,5,8,12,16,48,49,50,51];The adherends: The ductile damage model with damage parameters [3,5,8,12,16,48,49,50,51]. …”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes a very high stress concentration and, moreover, requires the application of hole drilling. These drawbacks can be overcome by introducing an adhesive layer to the connection and thus creating a hybrid joint (HJ) (e.g., [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]). The introduction of the adhesive when fabricating clinch joints may have another advantage due to the reduction of friction coefficients between the sheets [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As exposed, for predicting the strength of the FGAJs and model the load-displacement curves, the CZM approach was used. CZM is a powerful FEA method extensively used to predict the failure load of adhesive joints, 22,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and it was used in the present work due to the fact that this method proved to be accurate in several different scenarios which include fatigue, humidity, impact and even in MAJs. By modelling a mixed adhesive joint with several infinitesimal divisions where cohesive elements are applied, this method can be adapted to work with FGAJs.…”
Section: Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%