2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2017.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of the beam quality specifier for TomoTherapyHD treatment units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determination of these additional correction factors requires tissue maximum ratio and normalized peak-scatter factor for the field size S at 85 cm SSD,[ 19 ] which are not available. As reported by Howitz et al .,[ 12 ] the beam quality calculated by Monte-Carlo simulation was 0.628 and 0.631 from two different calculation methods and the experimental mean value of 0.635, all agreed within 1.28% to our measured value of 0.627.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determination of these additional correction factors requires tissue maximum ratio and normalized peak-scatter factor for the field size S at 85 cm SSD,[ 19 ] which are not available. As reported by Howitz et al .,[ 12 ] the beam quality calculated by Monte-Carlo simulation was 0.628 and 0.631 from two different calculation methods and the experimental mean value of 0.635, all agreed within 1.28% to our measured value of 0.627.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…determined both the experiment and Monte-carlo based beam quality index TPR 20,10 (10) at hypothetical 10 cm × 10 cm field size for the TomoTherapyHD machine. [ 12 ] Caprile et al . measured and calculated the output factors (OF) on the TomoTherapy machine with the smallest field size of 1.25 cm in the X-direction and fixed 5 cm jaw opening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%