1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7722(96)00063-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and modelling studies on diffusion of Cs, Ni and Sm in granodiorite, basalt and mudstone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements by water saturation method [1,4] were performed under about 60Torr pressure conditions for core samples with a size of φ30x50mm to accelerate the saturation and to remove air bubbles existing in the pores of the samples. In the measurements by Hg porosimetry [1,4], a sample cell with a volume of 0.5cm 3 was used, and pore sizes ≥ 3.4nm were measured. In the calculations of pore-size distribution and specific surface area of the pores, surface tension γ=0.480N/m and contact angle θ=140°were used.…”
Section: Materials and Measurements Of Fundamental Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements by water saturation method [1,4] were performed under about 60Torr pressure conditions for core samples with a size of φ30x50mm to accelerate the saturation and to remove air bubbles existing in the pores of the samples. In the measurements by Hg porosimetry [1,4], a sample cell with a volume of 0.5cm 3 was used, and pore sizes ≥ 3.4nm were measured. In the calculations of pore-size distribution and specific surface area of the pores, surface tension γ=0.480N/m and contact angle θ=140°were used.…”
Section: Materials and Measurements Of Fundamental Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other studies (Cho et al, 1993;Kato et al, 1995;Sato et al, 1997;Yamaguchi and Nakayama, 2001) have investigated the diffusivity of caesium, but most of these studies have only determined the apparent diffusivity, D a . This is related to the effective diffusion coefficient by:…”
Section: Diffusion Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have concentrated on pure bentonite (eg. Muurinen, 1990;Hsu et al, 1994;Jansson and Eriksen, 2001;Molera, 2002: Garcia-Gutierrez et al, 2006Suzuki et al, 2007) because of its proposed use in manmade barriers in radioactive waste disposal, and rocks from locations of prospective waste facilities (Sato et al, 1997;Lee et al, 2009;Wersin et al, 2008). Apparent diffusivities for various radionuclides are reported in many studies (Muurinen, 1990;Hsu et al, 1994;Sato et al, 1997) but, because the apparent diffusivity is affected by porosity and sorption, and the latter is sensitive to environmental conditions, these values are not readily applicable to other sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These predictions are in good agreement with findings for marine sediments with high porosity of 0.3-0.9 where the tortuosity factor varies between 1.2 and 4.8 (Iversen and Jørgensen, 1993). On the other hand, more consolidated media with low porosity (0.012-0.028) show much larger diffusional tortuosity factors, e.g., X values of $38, $4.5 Â 10 2 and $ 4.1 Â 10 3 were found for granodiorite, mudstone and basalt, respectively (Sato et al 1997).…”
Section: Effective Diffusivity and Tortuositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consolidated media with low porosity (0.012-0.028) the formation factors are usually very large. F values of $3.17 Â 10 3 , $2.61 Â 10 4 and $1.45 Â 10 5 are calculated for granodiorite, mudstone and basalt, respectively, using data of Sato et al (1997).…”
Section: Effective Diffusivity and Tortuositymentioning
confidence: 99%