2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and modelling approach to investigate the mechanisms of formation damage due to calcium carbonate precipitation in carbonate reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, asphaltene particles are very heavy and polar and prefer to stick onto the rock surface (solid surface) instead of dispersing into the liquid phase (oleic or aqueous phases) when conditions become thermodynamically unstable for them. On the other hand, pore blocking occurs when asphaltene particles are connected and form a bridge on the pore diameter, increasing the rate of asphaltene accumulation and reducing the core permeability. The reservoir cores used in this study are slightly tight in terms of permeability (5.83–11.83 mD). On the other hand, the asphaltene content of the crude oil used was about 0.9 wt %.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, asphaltene particles are very heavy and polar and prefer to stick onto the rock surface (solid surface) instead of dispersing into the liquid phase (oleic or aqueous phases) when conditions become thermodynamically unstable for them. On the other hand, pore blocking occurs when asphaltene particles are connected and form a bridge on the pore diameter, increasing the rate of asphaltene accumulation and reducing the core permeability. The reservoir cores used in this study are slightly tight in terms of permeability (5.83–11.83 mD). On the other hand, the asphaltene content of the crude oil used was about 0.9 wt %.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results show that the formation water type is NaHCO 3 , while the injection water type is MgCl 2 . According to the difference in ion and salinity of formation water and injection water, there is a potential incompatibility problem [21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Compatibility Test Of Injected Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surfactant flooding is one of the CEOR methods that has been successfully implemented for the past few decades; however, the environmental drawbacks of these chemical-based compounds have raised serious concerns about these materials. These chemical-based surfactants are toxic and nonenvironmentally friendly, restricting them from further development [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This investigation determined the capillary number (NCa) using Equation (1). In this equation, the IFT (mN/m) and contact angle of each case were measured directly from the performed experiments, and the viscosity of the solution (Pa.s), rock porosity, and velocity (m/s) of the injected solutions were measured separately, and used for capillary number calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%