Fly ash, industrial lime, and an additive [calcium hypochlorite (C)] were used to prepare a highly reactive absorbent. Simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification were carried out in a flue gas circulating fluidized bed (CFB). The effects of influencing factors on the removal efficiencies of SO 2 and NO were also investigated. Removal efficiencies of 94.5% for SO 2 and 65.5% for NO were obtained under the optimal experimental conditions. The component of the spent absorbent was analyzed with chemical analysis methods. The results indicated that more nitrogen than sulfur species appeared in the spent absorbent. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) and an accessory X-ray energy spectrometer (EDS) were used to observe the microproperties of the samples, including fly ash, highly reactive absorbent, and spent absorbent. The removal products of spent absorbent were analyzed using ion chromatography and chemical analysis. The simultaneous removal mechanism of SO 2 and NO based on this absorbent was proposed according to the experimental results.
2008American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 27: 460-468, 2008 Keywords: flue gas circulating fluidized bed, simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification, calcium hypochlorite, highly reactive absorbent, mechanism
INTRODUCTIONThe technology of desulfurization of flue gas with flue gas circulating fluidized bed (CFB) [1] was first proposed by Lurgi Lentjes Bischoff (LLB) company in Germany and was developed rapidly by the comprehensive investigation of the process and the engineering practice of the past 20 years. In the recent years, the interests in simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification of flue gas increased rapidly. Many technologies have been proposed, among which the stage treatment technology is considered to be a mature one. In this technology, a separate NO x control system, e.g., the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or the selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR), should be installed to the back of the desulfurization equipment. Although it succeeded in the combined removal of SO 2 and NO, it is not easy to achieve wide industrial application because of the large occupying area and high running cost. To reduce the cost of flue gas purification, development of new technologies and equipments of simultaneous flue gas desulfurization and denitrification has become the leading research direction in the air pollution control field. Investigations have been performed worldwide, but most of them have technical and economic defects deterring the use in practicable technologies.Since 1990, consecutive examinations concerning simultaneous flue gas desulfurization and denitrification have been widely reported [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Nevertheless, experiments were mostly conducted in a small-scale reactor in the laboratory, and those performed in a flue gas CFB have not been further developed. A drydesulfurization process using Ca(OH) 2 /fly ash sorbent in a CFB was proposed [9], however, a simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification was ...