2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and DFT characterization of η′ nano-phase and its interfaces in Al Zn Mg Cu alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been well established that the precipitation in the Al-Zn-Mg(-Cu) alloys is caused by diffusional nucleation followed by effective growth [6,79]. As discussed above (Section 4.1), the TiB2/Al interfaces are the favorable sites for nucleation of the interphase.…”
Section: Preferential Tib 2 /Al Interfaces For Suppressing the Interphase Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been well established that the precipitation in the Al-Zn-Mg(-Cu) alloys is caused by diffusional nucleation followed by effective growth [6,79]. As discussed above (Section 4.1), the TiB2/Al interfaces are the favorable sites for nucleation of the interphase.…”
Section: Preferential Tib 2 /Al Interfaces For Suppressing the Interphase Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Age-hardenable Al alloys (e.g., 2xxx, 6xxx and 7xxx series) have been widely applied as structural materials in aerospace and automobile industries, due mainly to their high specific strength and excellent processability [1][2][3]. Commonly, one of the most effective strengthening mechanisms involves precipitation hardening, i.e., a homogenous distribution of nanosized precipitates originating from solid-state precipitation reactions during aging treatments [4][5][6]. In addition, micron-(or submicron-) sized reinforcement particles (MRPs), such as SiC and B4C, have successfully been introduced to Al alloys, providing an alternative approach to further enhance their mechanical performance, particularly in case high Young's modulus is necessary [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it difficult to precisely determine the g¢/matrix interfacial energy. Based on DFT, Cao et al [45] have predicted interfacial energies of~44 and 190 mJ/m 2 for the coherent and semi-coherent interfaces, respectively. Hence in the present work, an optimal value of 0.1 J/m 2 has been used.…”
Section: Model Prediction Of G¢ Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semi-coherent η phase has been considered to be one of the major strengthening precipitates in the Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. The crystal structure of η phase was hexagonal with lattice parameters of a = 0.496 nm and c = 1.40 nm [11,12].η phase was an equilibrium phase in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys, and its crystal structure was hexagonal with lattice parameters of a = 0.5221 nm and c = 0.8567 nm [13,14]. GP zones and meta-stable η phase have been considered to play a dominant role on the strengthening of the alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%