2002
DOI: 10.1080/13642810110121018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and computational study of field emission characteristics from amorphous carbon single nanotips grown by carbon contamination - I. Experiments and computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is difficult from our experiments to identify the exact distribution of the emitting tips and the actual local fields on the emitting tips, the silicon nanowires in this letter provide some qualitative information regarding the field emission enhancement. According to the simulations of Edgcombe and Valdré, 19 the value of ␤ is proportional to ͑2.5+ h / r͒ 0.9 , where h is the length and r is the diameter of the emitting tip. In our previous study, 11 increasing the hydrogen plasma etching time sharpened the silicon nanowires and increased their lengths; thus, the field enhancement factor increased upon increasing the etching time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is difficult from our experiments to identify the exact distribution of the emitting tips and the actual local fields on the emitting tips, the silicon nanowires in this letter provide some qualitative information regarding the field emission enhancement. According to the simulations of Edgcombe and Valdré, 19 the value of ␤ is proportional to ͑2.5+ h / r͒ 0.9 , where h is the length and r is the diameter of the emitting tip. In our previous study, 11 increasing the hydrogen plasma etching time sharpened the silicon nanowires and increased their lengths; thus, the field enhancement factor increased upon increasing the etching time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ␥ factor of the diode-type field emitter can be approximated by the formula of ␥ = 1.2͑h / r + 2.15͒ 0.9 ϫ ͓1 − exp͑−2.3172s / h͔͒ in the range of 4 ഛ h / r ഛ 3000 by taking into consideration the effect of the interNCW distance and length of the NCW. [15][16][17] The h, r, and s symbols denote the length, radius of NCW, and interNCW distance between NCWs, respectively. To achieve the measured ␥ value, the interNCW distance has a value of ͑s 1 ജ 16 m͒ for H-NCWs and ͑s 2 ജ 32 m͒ for L-NCWs, assuming h =30 m, r = 0.01 m, as shown in the inset of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are probes ͑functionalized tips for scanning probe microscopy or for local conductivity measurements͒, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] conducting or nonconducting joining technique, [15][16][17][18][19][20] conducting wires, [21][22][23][24] mask repair, [25][26][27] electron sources, [28][29][30] micro-Hall and micro superconducting quantum interference devices, 31,32 nanotweezers and gripping devices, 33,34 nano-optic patterns or photonic crystals, 35,36 entire miniature electron optical systems, 37 diodes, 38 and seeds for nanotube growth. 39 Despite its long history, detailed knowledge of the process is still very much dispersed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%