1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1998.tb00919.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and clinical methods in the development of anti‐Alzheimer drugs

Abstract: Methodology used for the development of anti-Alzheimer's disease (AD) drugs raises specific problems which are rarely examined in the literature. While the general development scheme is similar to that required for most drugs, some specific aspects must be analyzed, highly dominated by the dual goal of pharmacology, i.e., to obtain both symptomatic and etiopathogenic drugs. During preclinical studies, aged or lesioned animals are mainly useful for symptomatic drugs, whereas transgenic models or neurodegenerati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is quite difficult to determine the effect of cholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) (Bentué-Ferrer et al 2001) on language and linguistics among the results of phase III trials in dementia that contributed to their marketing approval. Regulatory guidelines were very strict (Allain et al 1998) and the “cognitive” scales (ADAS-Cog, MMS, CGI, GDS) used for assessment contained few linguistic items, despite the frequency and importance of disorders of language comprehension and expression in patients with AD (Grossman et al 1996; Grossman et al 1998). …”
Section: Drugs and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite difficult to determine the effect of cholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) (Bentué-Ferrer et al 2001) on language and linguistics among the results of phase III trials in dementia that contributed to their marketing approval. Regulatory guidelines were very strict (Allain et al 1998) and the “cognitive” scales (ADAS-Cog, MMS, CGI, GDS) used for assessment contained few linguistic items, despite the frequency and importance of disorders of language comprehension and expression in patients with AD (Grossman et al 1996; Grossman et al 1998). …”
Section: Drugs and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, few consensus meetings or guidelines have been published on the management of BPSD further to those of the Canadian Medical Association [56] and the group of experts presided by Alexopoulos et al [2]. On the other hand, the recent history of the development of drugs for Alzheimer's disease illustrates the focalization of the specialists on the pure cognitive disorders and notably memory [3,4], even though the articles recommending new therapeutic strategies for dementia discuss the question and widen the drug targets to behaviour and non-cognitive signs of dementia according to the rules of 'disease management' [18,25,53,59,63].…”
Section: Practical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…▶ assessing the effects of putative neuroprotective, anti-degenerative, revalidation-supporting, mental health promoting, and/or cognition-enhancing compounds or treatments [ 27 , 41 - 44 ], and assessing risks (safety, teratology, toxicology) associated with these treatments [ 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%