2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental analysis on friction materials for supplemental damping devices

Abstract: In this paper, the friction coefficient and the cyclic response of different interfaces for friction devices are investigated by means of experimental tests under displacement control. In particular, six interfaces have been tested: steel–steel, brass–steel, sprayed aluminum–steel and three different rubber based friction materials adopted, respectively, in automotive applications, electrical machines and applications requiring low wearing.\ud Static and kinetic friction coefficients have been evaluated and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This project aims at developing and seismically prequalifies novel types of steel joints that dissipate the seismic energy by means of friction at the level of surfaces in contact clamped by preloaded bolts and specifically designed to undergo relative sliding at a given force level. The cyclic behaviour of these joints is stable with low degradation, even though it depends on the friction material used at the sliding interface [36][37][38][39][40]. Figure 1 depicts the two main typologies of the joints tested within [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This project aims at developing and seismically prequalifies novel types of steel joints that dissipate the seismic energy by means of friction at the level of surfaces in contact clamped by preloaded bolts and specifically designed to undergo relative sliding at a given force level. The cyclic behaviour of these joints is stable with low degradation, even though it depends on the friction material used at the sliding interface [36][37][38][39][40]. Figure 1 depicts the two main typologies of the joints tested within [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…k wc , can be assumed equal to 1, provided that normal stress at the column root radius does not exceed 70% of steel ultimate stress,. Thus the column web panel in transverse compression resistance is: (20) Therefore, the over-strength level of the panel web in transverse compression is given by the ratio: (21) which is consider sufficient in order to prevent brittle failure modes.…”
Section: Design Of Non-dissipative Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this scope, aiming to perform a further step towards the codification of design rules for dissipative joints, in last five years a significant experimental and analytical activity has been devoted to this topic by the research group of the University of Salerno [16][17][18][19][20][21]. In particular, to date, the experimental activity performed has regarded classical and innovative joint solutions which, according to the basic principle proposed by the research group of dissipating the seis-mic energy always in a specific joint component (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, external plates have slotted holes also in vertical direction to allow vertical displacement due to vertical loads (Figure 4). Adopted bolts are high resistance class 8.8 while the friction material adopted (FREEDAM project) is sprayed aluminum that is able to exhibit a friction coefficient of about 0.5 [38]- [39]. …”
Section: Worked Examplementioning
confidence: 99%