2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Analysis of Embankment on Ordinary and Encased Stone Columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also found that the settlement increased and the load-carrying capacity decreased with an increase in spacing up to an L/D ratio of 3 (beyond this, the change was negligible). For stone columns reinforced to L = 2D the improvement ratio was very high and the settlement reduction ratio was very low (Fattah et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also found that the settlement increased and the load-carrying capacity decreased with an increase in spacing up to an L/D ratio of 3 (beyond this, the change was negligible). For stone columns reinforced to L = 2D the improvement ratio was very high and the settlement reduction ratio was very low (Fattah et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is because of the higher confining stresses mobilized on smaller diameter columns. Fattah et al (2016) studied the behavior of stone columns in embankments and concluded that the Stress Concentration Ratio (SCR; the ratio of the stresses in the column to the surrounding soil) increases gradually with increasing L/D ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geogrid encasement of a stone column greatly decreases the lateral displacement compared with an ordinary stone column. Fattah et al (2014a and b) investigated the behavior of embankment models resting on soft soil reinforced with stone columns. Model tests were performed with different spacing distances between the stone columns and the two length-to-diameter ratios of the stone columns, in addition to the different embankment heights.…”
Section: Geogrid Encased Stone or Sand Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, many researchers advocate for resorting to stone column or geosynthetic-encased stone column technique of ground improvement, in particular, for soft soils, wherein settlements and stability, in tandem, are prime concerns to be addressed [44][45][46]. Stone columns develop bearing capacity by bulging deformation and lateral confinement offered by the surrounding soil [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%