2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-013-0142-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental analysis of different software packages for orientation and digital surface modelling from UAV images

Abstract: The use of UAVs finds application in a variety of fields, among which are the small scale surveys for environmental protection application. In this frame some experimental tests were carried out at Politecnico di Milano to assess metric accuracies of images acquired by UAVs and derived photogrammetric products. A block of 5 strips and 49 photos was taken by fixed wing system SenseFly, carrying a camera Canon Ixus 220HS on a rural area included in an Italian Park. Images are processed through bundle adjustment,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
77
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…These errors result in overestimation or underestimation of canopy cover, height, and 3D canopy surface area, whereas poor penetration of point clouds and shadows cast by dense canopies lead to incomplete information on the middle and lower canopy layers. Similar variations were found in other studies that used different software packages, which suggests that these variations are not related to matching algorithms [19,62,66]. In contrast to Müller et al [56] and Baltsavias et al [50], who conducted their studies in mountainous forest environments, we did not observe a clear relationship between ground slope and RMSD values.…”
Section: Influence Of Forest Structural Properties and Topographic Cosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These errors result in overestimation or underestimation of canopy cover, height, and 3D canopy surface area, whereas poor penetration of point clouds and shadows cast by dense canopies lead to incomplete information on the middle and lower canopy layers. Similar variations were found in other studies that used different software packages, which suggests that these variations are not related to matching algorithms [19,62,66]. In contrast to Müller et al [56] and Baltsavias et al [50], who conducted their studies in mountainous forest environments, we did not observe a clear relationship between ground slope and RMSD values.…”
Section: Influence Of Forest Structural Properties and Topographic Cosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Agisoft Photoscan 1.0 Professional, which is now relatively common in the UAS community, was used to perform photogrammetric surveys with proven efficiency (Dandois and Ellis 2013;2010;Sona et al 2014). Every flight dataset was processed by following the workflow described in Fig.…”
Section: General Photogrammetric Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 8667 UAV photos were used for point cloud production in Agisoft Photoscan Professional v1.2.4. Photoscan was used because it produces the most accurate surface models, and can deal with shadows better than other SfM packages [23]. The workflow recommended by the manufacturers was followed (also see Table 2 in [38]), and where possible, the same GCPs were used to georectify each model (one target was selected as a GCP per 20 m × 20 m grid cell of the survey site).…”
Section: Dtm Production (Site 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of DTMs from SfM techniques is affected by the amount of image overlap, camera calibration and sensor size, image quality [22], photogrammetry algorithm [23], UAV flying altitude [24,25], camera viewing angle [22,26,27], ground control point accuracy, and ground cover heterogeneity (i.e., featureless surfaces can cause additional error [22,26,28,29]). Fortunately, modern photogrammetric software can automatically detect tie points between photos, regardless of changes in camera orientation or survey distance, providing there is sufficient overlap between photos (50%-90%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%