2000
DOI: 10.2307/177115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Analysis of an Early Life-History Stage: Selection on Size of Hatchling Turtles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
123
3
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
123
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, stabilizing selection was more than twice as plausible as directional selection (AIC weights ratio, 0.709 : 0.291), whereas the naive analysis incorrectly selected the reverse pattern, that is, suggesting directional selection was about twice as plausible as stabilizing selection (AIC weights ratio, 0.664 : 0.336). This discrepancy between the naive and the MR analyses suggests that the curvilinear relationship between survival and body mass may be masked either by a direct correlation between body mass and detection probability (e.g., Janzen et al 2000; but additional analyses did not provide such evidence) or by an indirect relation of both parameters with a third life-history trait, such as age or body size. The observed pattern of stabilizing selection probably results from a trade-off between the risks of starvation at low body mass and predation at high body mass (Covas et al 2002).…”
Section: Natural Selection On Body Mass Of Sociable Weaversmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, stabilizing selection was more than twice as plausible as directional selection (AIC weights ratio, 0.709 : 0.291), whereas the naive analysis incorrectly selected the reverse pattern, that is, suggesting directional selection was about twice as plausible as stabilizing selection (AIC weights ratio, 0.664 : 0.336). This discrepancy between the naive and the MR analyses suggests that the curvilinear relationship between survival and body mass may be masked either by a direct correlation between body mass and detection probability (e.g., Janzen et al 2000; but additional analyses did not provide such evidence) or by an indirect relation of both parameters with a third life-history trait, such as age or body size. The observed pattern of stabilizing selection probably results from a trade-off between the risks of starvation at low body mass and predation at high body mass (Covas et al 2002).…”
Section: Natural Selection On Body Mass Of Sociable Weaversmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Monitoring individuals in multiple sites (so-called multistate MR models; Lebreton and Pradel 2002) can solve this problem by estimating phenotype-dependent movement among sites. Bias may also arise in the calculated strength and form of selection due to covariation between detection probability and the trait under selection (e.g., Janzen et al 2000). MR models can cope with this issue by relating the detection probabilities to the phenotypic trait values (Kingsolver and Smith 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vantagem adaptativa de produzir filhotes maiores ainda não está muito clara. Para filhotes de Trachemys scripta elegans (Wied, 1839) (Emydidae) a predação de filhotes foi dependente do tamanho dos filhotes, sendo que os maiores apresentaram uma redução da exposição à predação (Janzen et al, 2000). A premissa que filhotes maiores têm melhores condições de sobreviver, denominada de hipótese do "maior é melhor" (bigger is better), é defendida por inúmeros autores (Janzen 1993a,b;haskell et al, 1996;Janzen et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Para filhotes de Trachemys scripta elegans (Wied, 1839) (Emydidae) a predação de filhotes foi dependente do tamanho dos filhotes, sendo que os maiores apresentaram uma redução da exposição à predação (Janzen et al, 2000). A premissa que filhotes maiores têm melhores condições de sobreviver, denominada de hipótese do "maior é melhor" (bigger is better), é defendida por inúmeros autores (Janzen 1993a,b;haskell et al, 1996;Janzen et al, 2000). Em estudos com Chelydra serpentina (Linnaeus, 1758) (Chelydridae) em cativeiro, entretanto, bobyn & brooks (1994) mostraram que filhotes de tamanhos intermediários, com grandes reservas de vitelo, sobrevivem mais tempo e crescem mais rápido.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A caveat is, however, that our hatchlings experienced a predator-free environment. Relatively large hatchlings (from large eggs) may have had greater survival than small individuals if predators were present (Janzen 1993;Sorci and Clobert 1999;Janzen et al 2000), and this size-versus-survival relationship might differ between the sexes under more natural conditions.…”
Section: Hypothesis A: Different Optimal Egg Sizes For Sons Versus Damentioning
confidence: 99%