2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental analysis of a cross flow indirect evaporative cooling system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to compute the DB temperature of the supply air T s,db , where T r,db is the DB temperature of the return air and T o,wb is the WB temperature of the outdoor air. The effectiveness of 70% is determined based on typical values in the literature [34,35]. In order to avoid the risk of freezing, the IEC system operates dry in IASE mode.…”
Section: Indirect Evaporative Cooler (Iec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to compute the DB temperature of the supply air T s,db , where T r,db is the DB temperature of the return air and T o,wb is the WB temperature of the outdoor air. The effectiveness of 70% is determined based on typical values in the literature [34,35]. In order to avoid the risk of freezing, the IEC system operates dry in IASE mode.…”
Section: Indirect Evaporative Cooler (Iec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Antonellis et al [8] considered indirect evaporative cooling as a suitable way to improve the energy efficiency of an air-conditioning system. In their investigations on evaporative cooling, Suryawanshi et al [9] reported that a two-stage evaporative cooling system was 4.5 times better, in terms of efficiency, compared to a traditional air conditioning unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the evaporative losses can account for as much as 15%-20% of the water used each day [26,27]. Other researchers have analyzed and quantified water consumption for evaporative cooling purposes [8,28] and found that certain water flowrates improved the cooling performance of their systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the conditions of dry and wet bulb temperatures of 37.8 • C and 21.1 • C and the working air ratio of 0.364, the wet bulb effectiveness and the COP of the HMX achieved 114% and 52.5 respectively. Antonellis et al [15] carried out 112 experiments on a conventional cross-flow HMX in different conditions, and the results showed that the performance of the HMX was mainly affected by the water flow rate. Hui-Jeong Kim et al [16] carried out experiments on the cross-flow regenerative HMX and conventional cross-flow HMX in general and regenerative modes, and the results revealed that both the HMXs had higher wet bulb effectiveness in the conventional mode than in the regenerative mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%