Gas bearings in oil-free microturbomachinery for gas process applications and power generation (<400 kW) must be reliable and inexpensive, ensuring low drag power and thermal stability. Bump-type foil bearings (BEBs) and overleaf-type foil bearings are in use in specialized applications, though their development time (design and prototyping), exotic materials, and excessive manufacturing cost still prevent their widespread usage. Metal mesh foil bearings (MMEBs), on the other hand, are an inexpensive alternative that use common materials and no restrictions on intellectual property. Laboratory testing shows that prototype MMEBs perform similarly as typical BEBs, but offer significantly larger damping to dissipate mechanical energy due to rotor vibrations. This paper details a one-to-one comparison of the static and dynamic forced performance characteristics of a MMEB against a BEB of similar size and showcases the advantages and disadvantages of MMEBs. The bearings for comparison are a generation I BEB and a MMEB, both with a slenderness ratio LID = 1.04. Measurements of rotor lift-off speed and drag friction at start-up and airborne conditions were conducted for rotor speeds to 70 krpm and under identical specific loads (WILD = 0.06 to 0.26 bar). Static load versus bearing elastic deflection tests evidence a typical hardening nonlinearity with mechanical hysteresis, the MMEB showing two to three times more material damping than the BEB. The MMEB exhibits larger drag torques during rotor start-up, and shut-down tests though bearing lift-off happens at lower rotor speeds (~15 krpm). As the rotor becomes airborne, both beatings offer very low drag friction coefficients, ^0.03 for the MMEB and 0.04 for the BEB in the speed range 20-40 krpm. With the bearings floating on ajournai spinning at 50 krpm, the MMEB dynamic direct force coefficients show little frequency dependency, while the BEB stiffness and damping increases with frequency . The BEB has a much larger stiffness and viscous damping coefficients than the MMEB. However, the MMEB material loss factor is at least twice as large as that in the BEB. The experiments show that the MMEB, when compared to the BEB, has a lower drag power and earlier lift-off speed and with dynamic force coefficients having a lesser dependency on whirl frequency excitation.