2016
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace3020012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Aeroelastic Models Design and Wind Tunnel Testing for Correlation with New Theory

Abstract: Abstract:Several examples of experimental model designs, wind tunnel tests and correlation with new theory are presented in this paper. The goal is not only to evaluate a new theory, new computational method or new aeroelastic phonomenon, but also to provide new insights into nonlinear aeroelastic phenomena, flutter, limit cycle oscillation (LCO) and gust response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, installed sensors are invasive to the experimental model, locally changing its shape and/or mass, while providing only discrete information, typically with a relatively low spatial resolution. As a result, experimental reference data from wind tunnel measurements that can be used for the comparison with theoretical results and for calibrating computational models are typically limited to only a few quantities that are relatively easy to obtain, such as the wingtip deflection or the frequency of the dynamic motion [4].…”
Section: Aeroelasticity Dynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, installed sensors are invasive to the experimental model, locally changing its shape and/or mass, while providing only discrete information, typically with a relatively low spatial resolution. As a result, experimental reference data from wind tunnel measurements that can be used for the comparison with theoretical results and for calibrating computational models are typically limited to only a few quantities that are relatively easy to obtain, such as the wingtip deflection or the frequency of the dynamic motion [4].…”
Section: Aeroelasticity Dynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An aeroelastic model of the towering structure was manufactured in this study to make sure that the experimental model and prototype had the same frequency, mode shape, and damping ratio. It was not demanded to ensure that each frequency and mode shape of the prototype and the model is same, because the first mode dominates the dynamic behavior of towering structure, while the higher mode contributed little to it; thus the first frequency and the first mode shape of the prototype and the model should be the same [19]. e geometric scaling was set as 1 : 25, so the model was 1.7 meters high.…”
Section: Model Of the Frame-supportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Forward swept wings lead air onto the rear wing set, causing for more stability and efficiency. 11,12 Corrective components, such as winglets, are not required to maintain flight stability in an aircraft that uses forward swept wings due to the increased airflow displaced onto the rear wing set. Forward swept wings are predicted to be as, if not more, efficient than rear swept wings, 15,16 which means that the forward swept orientation could generate more lift and less drag when compared to rear swept wings.…”
Section: Forward Swept Wingsmentioning
confidence: 99%