2010
DOI: 10.3989/mc.2010.62810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentación y simulación numérica de tubos de hormigón con fibras

Abstract: RESUMENEn este artículo se presentan los resultados principales de un estudio experimental y numérico del comportamiento de tubos hormigón reforzado con fibras de acero (THFA). Se fabricaron y ensayaron 18 tubos de 600 mm de diámetro con cuantías de 10, 20 y 40 kg/m 3 de fibras, concluyéndo-se varios aspectos tecnológicos relacionados con la fabricación y el ensayo así como del comportamiento resistente. Por otra parte, se ha desarrollado el modelo numérico MAP que permite la simulación del comportamiento resi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 4, fiber contents ranged between 0 and 6 kg/m 3 . Amount of 4 kg/m 3 of PPFs was considered the lower bound to provide ductility of the composite respect the unreinforced concrete [48,49] whilst 6 kg/m 3 was fixed as an upper bound since higher amounts may compromise the workability and the finishing [50][51][52][53][54]. The select of ratio between fiber content of BF and PPF referred to the previous research results [47,53,54].…”
Section: Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 4, fiber contents ranged between 0 and 6 kg/m 3 . Amount of 4 kg/m 3 of PPFs was considered the lower bound to provide ductility of the composite respect the unreinforced concrete [48,49] whilst 6 kg/m 3 was fixed as an upper bound since higher amounts may compromise the workability and the finishing [50][51][52][53][54]. The select of ratio between fiber content of BF and PPF referred to the previous research results [47,53,54].…”
Section: Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the partial or total replacement of conventional reinforcement (e.g. rebar, mesh) with other forms of crack control has economical benefits, due to eliminating or reducing labour and equipment cost and their associated risks in construction (De La Fuente et al, 2011). One solution of interest is the use of steel fibre–reinforced concrete (SFRC), since it may offer structural performance benefits such as increased load-carrying capacity of slabs in service conditions, improved crack control, controlled interface slip in plastic loading stage (Abas et al, 2013; Ackermann and Schnell, 2008; Lin et al, 2014a, 2014b; Mansour et al, 2015; Petkevicius and Valivonis, 2010b) and greater fire resistance (Bednar et al, 2013) which can be translated into cost savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard PPC bridge beams are considered one of the key solutions to bridging problems in the short-to-medium-span range, typically ranging from 10 m to over 40 m. On the other hand, the stationary precasting industry offers optimal possibilities for steel fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) as a cement-based composite material. Although the use of SFRC allows for savings on assembling operations related to conventional reinforcement and for reductions in labor force, equipment use, and associated risks [7], steel fibers are often considered expensive. Additionally, reducing material weight through prestressing is essential due to elevation and transportation requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%