2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40948-021-00306-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment study on the evolution of permeability and heat recovery efficiency in fractured granite with proppants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are four experimental units in the device: a LN 2 injection unit, a high-temperature and triaxial pressure unit, a nitrogen fracturing unit, and a real-time data collection unit as shown in Figure 4(b). The detailed introduction of experimental device was published on another articles [28,49,50]. The axial pressure was kept at 30 MPa to prevent gas leakage during the injection of LN 2 and nitrogen fracturing.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four experimental units in the device: a LN 2 injection unit, a high-temperature and triaxial pressure unit, a nitrogen fracturing unit, and a real-time data collection unit as shown in Figure 4(b). The detailed introduction of experimental device was published on another articles [28,49,50]. The axial pressure was kept at 30 MPa to prevent gas leakage during the injection of LN 2 and nitrogen fracturing.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic fracturing proppant treatment is effective to decrease the fracture closing and maintain fluid circulation in geothermal production. Zhang and Wu [10] recently performed an experimental study on the evolution of permeability and heat recovery efficiency in fractured granite with proppants. They found that both permeability and heat recovery efficiency of samples decreased with the increase in rock temperature and confining pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a number of techniques have been employed to account for the complex fracture geometry, including discrete fracture grids [22] and the fracture continuum method [23]. Different software packages, including TOUGH2, GEOTH3D, FRACSIM-3D, GEOCRACK, FRACTure, NUFT, GEOS, CFRAC, PFLOTRAN and MULTIFLUX, have been utilised for field-scale simulations [24][25][26], and very few studies have focused on the small domains applicable to laboratory-scale experiments [27][28][29]. In addition, analytical solutions have often been used to validate the numerical results, but the number of attempts to validate the numerical work with real data sets (either field experiments or laboratory experiments) is meagre.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%