2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment research on rate-dependent constitutive model of Q420 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C-S model has been employed to simulate the dynamic response of different steels, as listed in Table 3 [12][13][14]17,30]. There exists significant difference in the characteristic parameters D and p, in particular, a vast gap can be found between the D values of different steels.…”
Section: Factors On Dynamic Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The C-S model has been employed to simulate the dynamic response of different steels, as listed in Table 3 [12][13][14]17,30]. There exists significant difference in the characteristic parameters D and p, in particular, a vast gap can be found between the D values of different steels.…”
Section: Factors On Dynamic Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since steel structure is very sensitive to the change of strain rate, diverse models have been established to predict the dynamic deformation behavior of structural steels [11][12][13][14][15]. The Johnson-Cook (J-C) model defines the constitutive relation of the effective yield stress with strain, strain rate and temperature [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11) was obtained by linear fitting, as shownFigure 9.Figure 8shows the comparison between test curves and the modified Mander model with different P. It can be seen that the curves derived from the model with a constant P = 2.67 have acceptable accuracy. Taking P as a constant makes the expression of the Mander model simple, but taking P as a variable expressed as Equation(11)makes the model have a better agreement with the test results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proposed constitutive model can provide better prediction accuracy for yield stress than the Johnson-Cook model.It has been proved experimentally that steel is significantly sensitive to the strain rate induced by dynamic loads [6][7][8]. Furthermore, it is possible for engineering structures to be exposed to extreme dynamic loads during their service life, such as vehicle or vessel collision, gas or bomb explosion [9], and progressive collapse [10][11][12]. Therefore, understanding the strain rate behavior and obtaining the rate-dependent constitutive model of reinforcing bar are of significance for the design and performance evaluation of RC structures under such extreme dynamic loads.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%