2020
DOI: 10.1002/tal.1829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment of torsional response induced by the Q–delta resonance

Abstract: Summary Because of geometric nonlinearities, vibrations in two horizontal directions can generate a torsional moment that induces a torsional response, even in a structure with no eccentricity; we term this phenomenon Q–Δ effect. In this study, the torsional response caused by the Q–Δ resonance was investigated by performing a shaking table test that involves a single‐layer symmetric specimen. The specimen was designed and fabricated by focusing on one of two resonance conditions. Its moment of inertia was adj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the results of a recent shaking‐table experiment were compared with simulation results, the resonance conditions were met, but the maximum amplitude of the steady torsional response was significantly different 25,26 . This is because the model did not fully capture the geometrical nonlinearity of the test body used in the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when the results of a recent shaking‐table experiment were compared with simulation results, the resonance conditions were met, but the maximum amplitude of the steady torsional response was significantly different 25,26 . This is because the model did not fully capture the geometrical nonlinearity of the test body used in the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, when the results of a recent shaking-table experiment were compared with simulation results, the resonance conditions were met, but the maximum amplitude of the steady torsional response was significantly different. 25,26 This is because the model did not fully capture the geometrical nonlinearity of the test body used in the experiment. Therefore, in this study, we intend to explain this phenomenon by using a model that assumes that the column is an elastic Euler beam, and we perform a more accurate modeling considering the bending-torsion interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The story stiffness values determined in each direction are listed in Table 9. The damping matrix of the simplified model was obtained from Equations ( 9) and (11) such that the damping factors were consistent with those of the reduced specimen, which are listed in Tables 5 and 6. Tables 10A,B show the natural frequencies of the simplified model derived using the aforementioned method, those of the reduced specimen, and the error rates.…”
Section: Construction Of An Equivalent Simplified Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is called the “Q–Δ effect.” When the natural frequencies of two orthogonal translational modes are different and the sum or difference of their natural frequencies coincides with that of the torsional mode, the Q–Δ effect induces resonance of the torsional mode. This phenomenon is called “Q–Δ resonance.” As the torsional moment generated by the Q–Δ effect is proportional to the product of the displacements in the two translational directions, special attention should be paid to this phenomenon in super‐high‐rise buildings, where large displacements occur during a long‐period earthquake motion input 11 . Mizutori and Kohiyama 11 demonstrated Q–Δ resonance via shaking table experiments using a one‐story specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation