2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.12.242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment design for improved frequency domain subspace system identification of continuous-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A frequency range from 60 to 500 Hz was selected with 3000 frequency lines. The frequency lines were selected based on the improved frequency selection method [45] for system identification with N4SID [38].…”
Section: Rear Subframementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequency range from 60 to 500 Hz was selected with 3000 frequency lines. The frequency lines were selected based on the improved frequency selection method [45] for system identification with N4SID [38].…”
Section: Rear Subframementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, bilinear (Tustin) transformation causes frequency warping (distortions) at higher frequencies. To avoid this problem, we utilize the experimental design procedure of [25] by first pre-warping the input frequencies that will be used while designing the sum-of-cosines input.…”
Section: A Discretization Via Bilinear (Tustin) Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The half-band width for a damped structural resonance at a certain frequency ω i can be expressed as ∆ω i = 2ξ i ω i where ξ i is the i:th relative modal damping. This is used in the calibration procedure, but in the EMA frequency lines were selected based on a more recent paper by Vakilzadeh et al [10] in which the authors advise in another selection strategy for improving the estimated state-space system with the N4SID method [11].…”
Section: Calibration Validation and Bootstrappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the calibration data was gathered from an adaptive multisine test where 10 frequencies were sent to to the shaker simultaneously. The improved frequency selection [10] for system identification with N4SID [11] was used in a frequency range from 40 to 700 Hz with 8200 frequency lines for the multisine test.…”
Section: Experimental Modal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation