Experiment Comparing Film And The Filmplane Radiology Workstation

Beard, David V.; Creasy, Jeffrey L.; Symon, Jeff; Cromartie, Robert

doi:10.1117/12.968732

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The radiologist is not familiar with the perceptual aspects of the viewing platform, display space is limited and the radiologist's interaction with the new display platform is much more complicated that with the traditional film-based platform. Results of observing the radiologist interpreting films at the digital workstation show that the radiologist's efficiency is decreased and the radiologist is less satisfied with the process [Beard 1988, Foley 1990, McNeill 1988. Are these observed problems a result of a fundamental limitation of the digital display platform or are they a reflection of our lack of understanding of what the radiologist actually does.…”

Section: Some Limitations Of Observation For Knowledge Acquisitionmentioning

confidence: 79%

<title>Intelligent interface to model the radiologist's requirements for primary image interpretation</title>

1992

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many functional, technical and perceptual considerations must be met before a workstation will be adequate for primary diagnosis. The focus of this paper is the functional aspect of the workstation. Specifically, we are concerned with determining how images and data must be presented to the radiologist, for the purpose ofprimary diagnosis, under the constraints imposed by the digital workstation. We have developed an interface that is being used to acquire detailed information about the current diagnostic process. The purpose of this interface is twofold. First, this interface enables us to monitor the image and information access patterns of the radiologists in the process of interpreting films. This information will be used to automate the presentation of images and information to the radiologist in future cases. Second, this interface provides a continuously evolving tool to capture the physical attributes, or navigational cues, necessary for the radiologist to develop a mental model of the operation of the diagnostic workstation. This report describes the current operation andfuture goals of this inteiface.

show abstract

Section: Some Limitations Of Observation For Knowledge Acquisitionmentioning

confidence: 79%

<title>Intelligent interface to model the radiologist's requirements for primary image interpretation</title>

1992

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 103 Compression techniques were described, 104 – 106 and digital workstations with comparison to conventional reading including user interface studies were presented. 107 – 115 Image networking and transmission studies, 116 – 118 and PACS technology impact 119 – 121 and cost analyses 122 , 123 papers were presented. Multiple institutions shared their PACS implementation experiences including the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Georgetown University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Washington University at St. Louis Mallinckrodt Institute, Kyoto University Japan, Victoria Hospital Canada, Toshiba Corporation, and the US Army.…”

Section: ’S Pacs Conferencesmentioning

confidence: 99%