2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment and numerical investigation of flow control on a supersonic inlet diffuser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation for mixed external-internal flow field is a special case to the turbulence model determination. Zhang et al [35] studied the impacts of turbulence models on the numerical results. Both k-ε and Spalart-Allmaras turbulence models match well with experiment data of a 2D supersonic inlet, which contains external and internal flow field.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Characteristics Of the New Bump Inlet 41 Preparation Of Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation for mixed external-internal flow field is a special case to the turbulence model determination. Zhang et al [35] studied the impacts of turbulence models on the numerical results. Both k-ε and Spalart-Allmaras turbulence models match well with experiment data of a 2D supersonic inlet, which contains external and internal flow field.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Characteristics Of the New Bump Inlet 41 Preparation Of Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other methods, such as the lip both translation and rotating variable-geometry inlet [19], the sidewall compression inlet adjustment with the lifting strut [20], a rigid structure rotation/translation scheme [21], and so on. Zhang [22] studied a two-dimensional variable-geometry inlet. The first stage of the inlet is curved compression, and the second compression wall extends to the throat and rotates around a fixed hinge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have been carried out in the literature to provide an understanding of the effects of various internal geometric concepts (for supersonic diffuser, throat and subsonic diffuser) [1,2,[11][12][13], upstream flow conditions [13,14], unstart [12,14], buzz oscillations [6][7][8] as well as the various active and passive boundary-layer control methods [14][15][16][17][18][19] on intake performance. According to these studies, out of the various boundarylayer control methods, the active control using a bleed system is the most preferred method for practical usage because of its strong impact on performance improvement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these studies, out of the various boundarylayer control methods, the active control using a bleed system is the most preferred method for practical usage because of its strong impact on performance improvement. Several investigations, considering different types of intakes such as rectangular, axisymmetric, chin as well as wavecatcher/three-dimensional (3D) intakes [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have shown that use of bleed and bypass systems lead to, i) an improvement in pressure recovery and flow uniformity because of the decrease in flow separation and the losses across the SWBLIs, ii) a delay in buzz oscillations because of shock stabilization [8,12] as well as iii) alleviate the "unstart because of SWBLI" [19][20][21]. It should be noted that, though the bleed systems result in an improvement in performance, they add to a loss in captured mass flow leading to drag penalty and the associated ducting leads to weight penalty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation