2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2015.01.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment and modeling of scintillation photon-counting and current measurement for PMT gain stabilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The F900's energy measurement is based on the charge content of the digitized and baseline-corrected anode-current signals, determined by numeric integration. The number representing the charge integral is then corrected for PMT gain shifts [16] and temperature effects on the scintillator's light yield [17], and finally translated in an energy tag, using a nonlinear calibration function. The latter is routinely parameterized with radioactive reference sources in the process of factory setup to best fit the energy range used for nuclide identification (30 keV to 3 MeV).…”
Section: A the Target F900 Backpack Radiation Detection Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F900's energy measurement is based on the charge content of the digitized and baseline-corrected anode-current signals, determined by numeric integration. The number representing the charge integral is then corrected for PMT gain shifts [16] and temperature effects on the scintillator's light yield [17], and finally translated in an energy tag, using a nonlinear calibration function. The latter is routinely parameterized with radioactive reference sources in the process of factory setup to best fit the energy range used for nuclide identification (30 keV to 3 MeV).…”
Section: A the Target F900 Backpack Radiation Detection Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exemplary pulse decompositions disclosing D3C events are shown in Figure 4. The middle picture points to a challenge: 30 keV energy deposited in a NaI(Tl) scintillator generate just 300-360 photoelectrons in an attached PMT with standard bialkali photocathode yielding 10-12 photoelectrons per keV [20], statistically distributed in time [21]. The small signal is hard to find if it piles up with an (often much larger) primary signal.…”
Section: B Signal Processing and Detection Of Delayed Coincidencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation of the detector responses to a distinct, immediate energy deposition in the crystal followed the model described in reference [21]. It comprised (i) The statistical generation of photoelectrons with a given yield per keV (phe/keV), (ii) The random temporal distribution of the individual photoelectrons according to a rise time of 14 ns and decay components of 0.23 𝜇s and 1.0 𝜇s contributing 97 % and 3 % to the overall light emission of the scintillator, respectively, (iii) The Poisson branching process of the photoelectrons at the first dynodes [22],…”
Section: E Simulation Of Delayed Coincidence Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the detector response needs to be precisely characterized, and the scintillation crystal aging has to be monitored. Temperature effects on the light yield and PMT gain should be corrected with stabilization techniques [88]. Furthermore, a good knowledge of the γ-ray attenuation coefficients in the patient volume behind the treated area is mandatory.…”
Section: K Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%