2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiential financial education: A field study of my classroom economy in elementary schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, there is an additional learning effect of 0.04 standard deviations from being assigned a homework alone and 0.03 standard deviations from being assigned a homework with parents, yet, the F-tests indicate that these differences between coefficients are not significant. The observed average effect size of the three interventions on financial knowledge amounts to 0.29, which is larger than the effects on financial knowledge found in previous financial education experiments, such as the effect of 0.25 standard deviations (with a standard error of 0.299) detected by Bruhn et al (2016), 0.16 standard deviations (with a standard error of 0.075) observed by Bover et al (2018), 0.20 standard deviations (with a standard error of 0.319) seen by Batty et al (2017) and 0.14 standard deviations (with a standard error of 0.022)…”
Section: Intention-to-treat Effectcontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, there is an additional learning effect of 0.04 standard deviations from being assigned a homework alone and 0.03 standard deviations from being assigned a homework with parents, yet, the F-tests indicate that these differences between coefficients are not significant. The observed average effect size of the three interventions on financial knowledge amounts to 0.29, which is larger than the effects on financial knowledge found in previous financial education experiments, such as the effect of 0.25 standard deviations (with a standard error of 0.299) detected by Bruhn et al (2016), 0.16 standard deviations (with a standard error of 0.075) observed by Bover et al (2018), 0.20 standard deviations (with a standard error of 0.319) seen by Batty et al (2017) and 0.14 standard deviations (with a standard error of 0.022)…”
Section: Intention-to-treat Effectcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Parents could, therefore, help to answer the questions in the homework and offer further explanation to the students. Second, as 6 The teaching material was in line with the contemporary need of interactive learning (Amagir, Groot, Maassen van den Brink, & Wilschut, 2017;Batty et al, 2015) and positive experimental evidence on active learning methods in financial education (Batty et al, 2017;Kaiser & Menkhoff, 2018). the parents understand their child well, they could alter the learning process based on their child's character and interests.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the common true effect assumption is potentially problematic in the context of heterogeneous financial education interventions, we estimate the mean of a distribution of true effects using the model specified in equation 3. In addition to the mentioned theoretical reasons 11 We convert the correlations used as an effect size metric by . This is true under the assumption that the outcome measures in each group are continuous and normally distributed and that the treatment variable is a binary variable indicating treatment and control groups, i.e., a valid assumption in the context of RCTs.…”
Section: A Meta-analysis Of Randomized Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a good reason for this, as there are high returns to imparting such knowledge in these early and formative years of one's life. For example, Urban et al () finds that personal finance education in high school positively affects post‐graduation credit reports, and several other studies have also examined interventions on students (e.g., Batty et al ; Cole, Paulson, and Shastry ; Stoddard, Urban, and Schmeiser ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%