1971
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(71)90111-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences with transseptal left heart catheterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our laboratory transeptal puncture is never attempted unless the operator is certain that the catheter has properly engaged the fossa ovalis. Failure to advance the transeptal catheter from the left atrium into the left ventricle occurred in 7.7% of our series, which compares favorably with other reports [13,14]. The overall failure rate to enter the left ventricle with the transeptal technique in patients with aortic stenosis in this series was 15 % .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our laboratory transeptal puncture is never attempted unless the operator is certain that the catheter has properly engaged the fossa ovalis. Failure to advance the transeptal catheter from the left atrium into the left ventricle occurred in 7.7% of our series, which compares favorably with other reports [13,14]. The overall failure rate to enter the left ventricle with the transeptal technique in patients with aortic stenosis in this series was 15 % .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although this is slightly higher than the failure rate of up to 8% reported by other authors [5,[13][14][15],181, we have undertaken transeptal catheterization in patients who were often in advanced stages of disease with atrial enlargement. More than half of our failures (1 1 of 20) were due to inability to identify the fossa ovalis, which is likely to occur as the left atrium enlarges [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Failure to enter the left atrium occurred in 8.6% of our series, which is comparable with the failure rate of up to 10% reported by other authors (Brockenbrough et al, 1962;Enghoff and Cullhed, 1971;Lew et al, 1983). Failure to advance the transseptal catheter from the left atrium into the left ventricle occurred in 3.9 % of our series, which compares favorably with other reports (Brockenbrough et al, 1962;Enghoff and Cullhed, 1971; Lew et al, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…With the exception of the retrograde aortic catheterization technique, these methods all had diagnostic limitations, were associated with technical difficulties, and were potentially dangerous as well as painful (Bagger et Failure to enter the left atrium occurred in 8.6% of our series, which is comparable with the failure rate of up to 10% reported by other authors (Brockenbrough et al, 1962;Enghoff and Cullhed, 1971;Lew et al, 1983). Failure to advance the transseptal catheter from the left atrium into the left ventricle occurred in 3.9 % of our series, which compares favorably with other reports (Brockenbrough et al, 1962;Enghoff and Cullhed, 1971;Lew et al, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In some cases, a stronger than usual push achieved successful crossing but the operator has to be alert to restricting the forward motion as soon as the catheter is within the left atrium. Extremes of force have to be avoided as the needle tip can fracture from its shaft.9 10 If the needle did not cross the septum a different position, usually a lower one within the left atrial visual target area, was tried. If the needle crossed a tough septum but the catheter would not follow then a change from an adult to a paediatric Brockenbrough catheter and needle could be successful.…”
Section: Crossing Of Atrial Septummentioning
confidence: 99%