Abstract:Background
Clinical trials have found that a monthly dapivirine vaginal ring was well-tolerated and reduced HIV-1 risk among women in sub-Saharan Africa. However, in order for the ring or other novel prevention methods to have optimal impact, it is necessary to understand and address women’s challenges to uptake and adherence. This paper provides insight into a few key challenges noted by women using the ring and contraceptives simultaneously.
Methods
… Show more
“…As other studies have shown, some participants reported negative experiences following menses suppression with a preference in non-suppression (13,18,22). Similar to these studies, we found that menstrual suppression caused worry, fear, and anxiety about unintended pregnancies, among negative health outcomes like infections, hormonal imbalances, and cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Following pregnancy tests and a doctor's confirmation of no underlying health issues, the majority of participants felt at ease. However, like other studies (13,16,18,19,22), a few participants had persistent fear and anxiety whenever they missed menses, and uncertainty about when they expected menses disincentivizing them from NuvaRing use. These negative experiences may be associated with existing literature ( 16) that the community regarded women without menses as pregnant or infertile, abnormal, bewitched, or unhealthy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In this study, participants with positive experiences expressed acceptance and a desire to continue using NuvaRing; however, those with negative attitudes had mixed emotions, with some expressing a desire to continue using NuvaRing but had fears of the unintended negative consequences. These findings have been found with the use of other products as well, such as contraception, other rings, and microbicides (13,13,18,22), showing the significance of end-user experiences in influencing the acceptability and use of an intervention or product, in this case, the NuvaRing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Similar to these studies, we found that menstrual suppression caused worry, fear, and anxiety about unintended pregnancies, among negative health outcomes like infections, hormonal imbalances, and cancer. Existing literature demonstrate that contraceptives or ring users worry about future infertility and are uncertain about birth control effectiveness hence preventing their use or result in discontinuation (13,18,22). Although comprehensive counselling may not sufficient by itself, these concerns illustrate how crucial it is to understand the user pregnancy intentions among other concerns to support designing and providing complete counselling messages on use and adherence to avoid unintended consequences and support mental health (6,7,(13)(14)(15)17,21,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in other studies, results from this study demonstrate varied participants' knowledge of potential side effects of continued NuvaRing use on menses suppression, highlighting the importance of enduser regular tailored comprehensive counseling of an interventions use including side effects. This counseling should consider and align with individual and community levels of knowledge, needs, feelings, perceptions and concerns to address potentially harmful or negative perceptions that may influence an intervention or product acceptability, use and adherence (6,7,17,18,22).…”
Background: The contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing), one of the Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPT) products, is effective in preventing unintended pregnancies and may contribute to reducing the frequency of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV), which is a risk factor for HIV acquisition, transmission, and shedding among women. NuvaRing may cause irregular menstruation, including menstrual suppression, which may influence women's decision on product choice, use, and acceptability. In this prospective cohort study, we assessed women's experiences with menstruation suppression following continued NuvaRing use. Methods: A total of 18 in-depth interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide among purposively selected women with BV in Thika, Kenya, aged 18-40 years, who used NuvaRing continuously. All women received counseling on possibility of menstrual suppression following continuous NuvaRing use. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Results: Participants who expected and were aware that menstrual suppression was a possible side effect of Nuvaring accepted its benefits, and expressed acceptance and desire to continue using NuvaRing. Participants who had not anticipated menstrual suppression expressed anxiety and fear, with some expressing desire to continue using NuvaRing but worried about unintended negative consequences. The ability to perform daily activities uninterrupted, reduced expenses on sanitary supplies, enhanced sexual pleasure and relationships, and absence of menstrual pain were benefits of menstrual suppression. Although all participants received counseling on menstrual suppression, some expressed anxiety over the possibility of unintended pregnancy. As a result, they frequented medical facilities for health check-ups and pregnancy tests, and some used combined oral contraceptives to induce menses. Conclusion: Understanding perceptions regarding menstrual suppression is crucial in offering targeted and comprehensive counseling to improve women's understanding of menstruation suppression to influence acceptance and use of NuvaRing. Additionally, improved male involvement in reproductive health concerns and women's autonomy in discussing reproductive health issues with partners is essential.
“…As other studies have shown, some participants reported negative experiences following menses suppression with a preference in non-suppression (13,18,22). Similar to these studies, we found that menstrual suppression caused worry, fear, and anxiety about unintended pregnancies, among negative health outcomes like infections, hormonal imbalances, and cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Following pregnancy tests and a doctor's confirmation of no underlying health issues, the majority of participants felt at ease. However, like other studies (13,16,18,19,22), a few participants had persistent fear and anxiety whenever they missed menses, and uncertainty about when they expected menses disincentivizing them from NuvaRing use. These negative experiences may be associated with existing literature ( 16) that the community regarded women without menses as pregnant or infertile, abnormal, bewitched, or unhealthy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In this study, participants with positive experiences expressed acceptance and a desire to continue using NuvaRing; however, those with negative attitudes had mixed emotions, with some expressing a desire to continue using NuvaRing but had fears of the unintended negative consequences. These findings have been found with the use of other products as well, such as contraception, other rings, and microbicides (13,13,18,22), showing the significance of end-user experiences in influencing the acceptability and use of an intervention or product, in this case, the NuvaRing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Similar to these studies, we found that menstrual suppression caused worry, fear, and anxiety about unintended pregnancies, among negative health outcomes like infections, hormonal imbalances, and cancer. Existing literature demonstrate that contraceptives or ring users worry about future infertility and are uncertain about birth control effectiveness hence preventing their use or result in discontinuation (13,18,22). Although comprehensive counselling may not sufficient by itself, these concerns illustrate how crucial it is to understand the user pregnancy intentions among other concerns to support designing and providing complete counselling messages on use and adherence to avoid unintended consequences and support mental health (6,7,(13)(14)(15)17,21,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in other studies, results from this study demonstrate varied participants' knowledge of potential side effects of continued NuvaRing use on menses suppression, highlighting the importance of enduser regular tailored comprehensive counseling of an interventions use including side effects. This counseling should consider and align with individual and community levels of knowledge, needs, feelings, perceptions and concerns to address potentially harmful or negative perceptions that may influence an intervention or product acceptability, use and adherence (6,7,17,18,22).…”
Background: The contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing), one of the Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPT) products, is effective in preventing unintended pregnancies and may contribute to reducing the frequency of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV), which is a risk factor for HIV acquisition, transmission, and shedding among women. NuvaRing may cause irregular menstruation, including menstrual suppression, which may influence women's decision on product choice, use, and acceptability. In this prospective cohort study, we assessed women's experiences with menstruation suppression following continued NuvaRing use. Methods: A total of 18 in-depth interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide among purposively selected women with BV in Thika, Kenya, aged 18-40 years, who used NuvaRing continuously. All women received counseling on possibility of menstrual suppression following continuous NuvaRing use. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Results: Participants who expected and were aware that menstrual suppression was a possible side effect of Nuvaring accepted its benefits, and expressed acceptance and desire to continue using NuvaRing. Participants who had not anticipated menstrual suppression expressed anxiety and fear, with some expressing desire to continue using NuvaRing but worried about unintended negative consequences. The ability to perform daily activities uninterrupted, reduced expenses on sanitary supplies, enhanced sexual pleasure and relationships, and absence of menstrual pain were benefits of menstrual suppression. Although all participants received counseling on menstrual suppression, some expressed anxiety over the possibility of unintended pregnancy. As a result, they frequented medical facilities for health check-ups and pregnancy tests, and some used combined oral contraceptives to induce menses. Conclusion: Understanding perceptions regarding menstrual suppression is crucial in offering targeted and comprehensive counseling to improve women's understanding of menstruation suppression to influence acceptance and use of NuvaRing. Additionally, improved male involvement in reproductive health concerns and women's autonomy in discussing reproductive health issues with partners is essential.
Historically, pregnant and lactating populations (PLP) have been excluded or disenrolled from biomedical HIV prevention trials, despite being more likely to acquire HIV during pregnancy and the post-partum period. We conducted a meta-analysis of pregnancy events in biomedical HIV prevention trials in sub-Saharan Africa to support trialists moving toward more inclusive clinical and implementation studies. We searched peer-reviewed literature reporting pregnancy events and contraceptive requirements in HIV prevention trials between 2001 and 2022. We hypothesized four variables to explain variation: contraceptive requirements, study start year, study product, and sub-region. We fit a meta-analytic model to estimate individual effect sizes and sampling variances, then conducted sub-group analyses to assess moderating effects. We identified 38 references for inclusion, across which the proportion of pregnancy events was 8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6–10%) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 99%). Studies not requiring contraceptives (21%, 95%CI: 7–48%) reported a significantly higher proportion of pregnancy events than studies requiring two methods (5%, 95%CI: 2–10%). Studies launched between 2001 and 2007 (11%, 95%CI: 8–16%), microbicide gel trials (12%, 95%CI: 8–18%), and studies conducted in Western Africa (28%, 95%CI: 13–51%) reported higher proportions of pregnancy events than reference groups. Together, these variables have a moderating effect on pregnancy events (p < 0.0001), explaining 63% of heterogeneity in trials. Results describe how, over time, more stringent contraceptive requirements reduced pregnancy events, which ensured necessary statistical power but limited reproductive choice by participants. With the move toward continuing PLP on experimental products, trialists can utilize estimated pregnancy events reported here to inform strategies that accommodate participants’ changing fertility preferences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.