Experiences with opt-in, at-home screening for SARS-CoV-2 at a primary school in Germany: an implementation study

Abstract

BackgroundOver the course of the pandemic, many countries have repeatedly closed schools and shifted schoolchildren to remote learning. However, evidence for negative mental and physiological health consequences of such measures for schoolchildren is increasing, highlighting the need for evidence-based recommendations on how to safely reopen schools. This study aims to assess implementation experiences, acceptability and feasibility of opt-in, at-home SARS-CoV-2 screening using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to facilitate safe face-to-face teaching during a pandemic.MethodsWe present data from a prospective study implementing an RDT-based screening programme at a primary school in southwest Germany. In addition to quantitative data collected to assess screening diagnostic yield (number of participants, tests handed out to participants, positive RDT results reported), we conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with participating pupils, parents and school stakeholders to elicit implementation experiences and screening perceptions.ResultsThe screening intervention was highly accepted and appreciated among participants; no screening-associated positive RDT was reported over the duration of the study. Self-testing at home before coming to school was feasible, but more positive consequences of screening participation (eg, easing of mask mandates) besides a personal feeling of safety would have been appreciated across respondent groups. Participants preferred home-based RDTs over some other measures, particularly mask mandates. Despite the RDTs being licensed as self-tests in Germany, additional training can help avoid mistakes, and ensuring intervention ownership and improving pre-implementation communication can facilitate buy-in.ConclusionsAntigen-RDT-based SARS-CoV-2 screening programmes relying on self-testing at home are a feasible and acceptable supplement to the public health toolbox to facilitate a safe return to face-to-face teaching at schools.Trial registration numberDRKS00024845.

Exploration of the uptake of asymptomatic COVID-19 lateral flow testing in Birmingham, UK: survey and qualitative research

“…However, testing was seen as a way to afford individuals peace of mind when interacting with others, including family and friends and those perceived to be more vulnerable to the effects of COVID-19 infection. In the Liverpool pilot evaluation, 16% of respondents stated that they would also highlight the peace of mind given by testing if promoting testing to others, findings echoed elsewhere 11 12 15. In fixed survey responses in the Birmingham survey, more than half of participants stated that there were likely to see friends and family following a negative LFT result.…”

“…It is probable that this may be moderated by improving test comfort. However, a pilot of primary school testing in Germany found that while parents were concerned about additional burden children suggested that testing was less burdensome than other restrictions, such as mask mandates 15…”

The clinical utility and epidemiological impact of self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 using antigen detecting diagnostics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…[NJ]) [30], another the RIDA QUICK SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (R-Biopharm, German) [32] and for the third the Ag-RDT used was unclear [27]. In eleven data sets (64.7% of all data sets), the sample type was anterior nasal / mid-turbinate (AN/MT) [28][29][30][31][32][33]35 [29,31,33,34] for testing twice weekly.…”

“…Linkage for positive tests: Actions after a positive test result were reported in 11 datasets across two different settings. In nine data sets, positive results in mostly asymptomatic people required isolation (eight data sets) [16,17,29,31] or an invitation to seek confirmatory rRT-PCR testing (one data set) [15]. Second, in two datasets, positive test results of contacts already in quarantine required isolation [15,28].…”

“…Testing uptake: In five datasets (10,336 individuals) testing was voluntary and the health impact of self-testing in the community was examined [16,17,28,29]. Across these datasets, testing uptake was estimated to be 53.2% (95% CI 36.7% to 68.9%), ranging from 75.7% in hospital staff [29] to 25.8% in university students and staff [16] (Fig 4).…”