Experiences Using Family or Peer Support for Smoking Cessation and Considerations for Support Interventions: A Qualitative Study in Persons With Mental Health Conditions

Nagawa, Catherine S; Lane, Ian A; Davis, Maryann; Wang, Bo; Pbert, Lori; Lemon, Stephenie C.; Sadasivam, Rajani S.

doi:10.1080/15504263.2022.2159732

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We used Rapid Qualitative Analysis, an efficient method of qualitative analysis when pre-set questions are being explored (e.g., acceptability of the texting system), to extract information from each interview and to compile findings across interviews in a series of domains [20][21][22], an efficient method of qualitative analysis when pre-set questions are being explored (e.g., acceptability for the texting system).…”

Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer Texting to Promote Quitline Use and Smoking Cessation Among Rural Participants in Vietnam: Randomized Clinical Trial

Sadasivam,

Nagawa,

Wijesundara

et al. 2024

Int J Public Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: We tested an adapted version of an effective U.S.-based peer-texting intervention to promote Quitline use and smoking cessation among rural participants in Vietnam.Methods: We conducted a two-arm randomized trial with participants recruited at four rural community centers. The intervention included peer messages sent for six months that promoted Quitline use and smoking cessation. Additionally, biweekly two-way text messages assessed participants’ interest in Quitline referral and current smoking status. Comparison participants received only the bi-weekly text message assessment of their current smoking status. At six months, we assessed Quitline use and smoking cessation. Smoking cessation was assessed using the 7-day point prevalence question and verified with a carbon monoxide breath monitor (<=6 ppm).Results: Among 750 participants, the intervention had higher Quitline verified use (18%, 95% CI 0.14, 0.22) than comparison (1%, 95% CI .2, 2, p < 0.0001). Carbon-monoxide-verified smoking cessation did not differ between the two groups. However, intervention (28.3%, 95% CI) and comparison (28.1%, 95% CI) participants had substantial rates of carbon monoxide cessation at 6 months (both 28%).Conclusion: Our study highlighted the promise of texting interventions to extend tobacco control efforts in Vietnam.

show abstract

Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%