Experiences of precarious work within higher education institutions: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Abstract

IntroductionA qualitative evidence synthesis was employed, to identify and synthesize the best evidence on the experiences of precariously employed academics in high education institutions.MethodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) principles were followed. The identified studies were screened by titles and abstracts (n = 308)-full-text (n = 19), employing these inclusion criteria: studies reporting on precarious employment experiences in higher education; part-time or fixed-term academic positions; qualitative studies between 2010 to 2021. The selected studies were not limited to a particular geographical location. A quality appraisal was conducted. Data were extracted while findings from the included studies (n = 19) were collated using meta-aggregation with the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI). The primary study findings emanated from research conducted across 14 countries both from the northern and southern hemispheres.ResultsNinety-four extracted findings were aggregated into 19 categories and then grouped into five synthesized findings: (1) Precarity is created and perpetuated through structural changes in the global economy and wider higher education landscape; (2) Coping strategies precariously employed academics used to endure precarious employment in higher education; (3) Gendered dimensions shaping employment precarity in academia; (4) Impact of precarious employment on academics; (5) Impact of academic precarity on the university.DiscussionThese precariously employed academics felt overwhelmed, vulnerable, exploited, stressed, anxious, and exhausted with their employment conditions. These circumstances include operating in unstable and insecure employment with no guarantees of permanent employment. The need to reassess policies and practices within higher education institutions is necessary and could offer these precariously employed academics the much-needed support and assistance to combat the effects of precarious employment.

Humanising pedagogic research in higher education: A reflective commentary on a university-wide special interest group

“…postdoctoral, teaching or research fellows) on temporary contracts feel the pressure to engage with research (i.e. conducting original research or developing skills in this area) on top of their workloads to secure a position in an increasingly competitive higher education environment (Solomon & Du Plessis, 2023). Characterised as "non-academic citizens" (O'Keefe & Courtois, 2019, p. 463) who are often denied "ownership over or credit for their work" (p. 472) and "the most vulnerable group within the academic ranks" (Solomon & Du Plessis, 2023, p. 2), it is particularly important to acknowledge the interest to the SIG from this group.…”

Editorial 6(2): Personal digital assistant or job killer? Generative AI and the teaching profession in higher education

“…Martin Andrew (2023) tells the story of a learner who discovered her online professor had been dead since 2019. Since the pandemic, there has been an increase in the precarity and casualisation of academic labour, which is undervalued, overused, and stigmatised (Solomon & Du Plessis, 2023). The above-described trends of the fall of the faculty (Ginsberg, 2011), the loss of faith in university education (Collini, 2012), the demise of homo academicus (Fleming, 2021), the denigration of the teaching profession and the devaluation of learning (Popenici, 2023a) all precede the rise of generative AI in higher education.…”