Background:The success of a cardiovascular health check programme depends not only on the identification of individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but also on reducing CVD risk. We examined factors that might influence engagement and adherence to lifestyle change interventions and medication amongst people recently assessed at medium or high risk of CVD (>10% in the next 10 years).Method: Qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using the Framework method.Results: Twenty-two participants (12 men, 10 women) were included in the study. Four broad themes are described: (a) the meaning of 'risk', (b) experiences with medication, (c) attempts at lifestyle change, and (d) perceived enablers to longer-term change. The experience of having a health check was mostly positive and reassuring.Although participants may not have understood precisely what their CVD risk meant, many reported efforts to make lifestyle changes and take medications to reduce their risk. Individual's experience with medications was influenced by family, friends and the media. Lifestyle change services and family and friends support facilitated longerterm behaviour change.Conclusions: People generally appear to respond positively to having a CVD health check and report being motivated towards behaviour change. Some individuals at higher risk may need clearer information about the health check and the implications of being at risk of CVD. Concerns over medication use may need to be addressed in order to improve adherence. Strategies are required to facilitate engagement and promote longer-term maintenance with lifestyle changes amongst high-risk individuals.
K E Y W O R D Scardiovascular disease, cardiovascular prevention, NHS Health Check, qualitative research
| INTRODUC TI ONCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of death globally 1 and accounts for around 160 000 deaths annually in the United Kingdom (UK). 2 A large proportion of CVD might be preventable through modification of behavioural risk factors (smoking, lack of physical activity) and taking preventive medication. There is evidence that multiple risk factor interventions for people without CVD, with or 194 | ALAGEEL Et AL.without pharmacological treatments, appear to have little impact on CVD risk and CVD risk factors 3,4 or on the risk of coronary heart disease mortality or morbidity. 5Evidence suggests that communicating information about disease risk to people is challenging and complex. 6 Risk information on its own is not effective and needs to be coupled with other intervention elements to promote healthy behaviour. 7 A systematic review of the literature of providing coronary risk information to adults suggested that whilst global risk information seems to improve the accuracy of risk perception, there is no evidence that risk perception translated into lifestyle changes. 7 Providing risk information to health-care providers appeared to increase medication prescribing, 7 but the evidence is unclear of the efficacy o...