Experiences of inter- and transdisciplinary research – a trajectory of knowledge integration within a large research consortium

Abstract

Although inter-and transdisciplinary research has found its way to the forefront of calls, funding and publications, interdisciplinary projects often start from scratch constructing their research environment. In this article we will point to the enormous potential, the learnings, as well as some of the difficulties and pitfalls frequently encountered in large interdisciplinary project consortia. With this in mind, we aim to transparently document and reflect upon our research process, reminding the readers that the authors are not academic specialists in the field of inter-and transdisciplinarity nor in the sociology of knowledge. To explain our motivation, we want to share valuable experiences and point to some learnings, especially regarding the interdependencies between inter-and transdisciplinarity. After a brief historical retrospective of the expectations towards science, the article describes the trajectory of knowledge production and integration of a rather large research consortium attempting to overcome typical communicative and conceptual hurdles while negotiating the strict preconceptions of the respective disciplines. During the process of knowledge integration, scientific recognition and time budgets remain the crucial challenges. Besides joint field research, the construction of four storylines and the continuous integration of data into the various and increasingly interlinked models that ultimately culminate in our future scenarios led to constant communication and disputes among the subprojects involved. During the course of the project, it became obvious that a new generation of young scientists is developing: scientists working in interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary thought communities with a grasp of both fundamental science and transdisciplinary practice, combined with the soft skills necessary to reconcile both worlds.Zusammenfassung: Obwohl inter-und transdisziplinäre Forschung in aller Munde ist, beginnen Forschungskonsortien in der Regel ganz von vorne, wen sie ihre Forschungslandschaft aufbauen. In diesem Artikel werden wir auf die großen Potentiale und Lernprozesse sowie auf die Schwierigkeiten großer interdisziplinärer Forschungskonsortien hinweisen. Es ist unser Anliegen, unseren Forschungsprozess transparent zu dokumentieren und zu reflektieren. Wir weisen darauf hin, dass die wissenschaftlichen Schwerpunkte der AutorInnen nicht bei der Erforschung von Inter-und Transdisziplinarität liegen und wir auch keine Wissenssoziologen sind. Die Motivation dieser interdisziplinären Forschergruppe ist es, wertvolle Erfahrungen zu teilen und einige Lernerfahrungen besonders hervorzuheben. Nach einem kurzen Rückblick auf sich wandelnde Wissenschaftsbegriffe, beschreiben wir den Verlauf gemeinsamer Wissensproduktion und Integration im Carbiocial-Konsortium.; die Überwindung kommunikativer und konzeptioneller Hürden gehörten ebenso dazu, wie die Verhandlungsprozesse disziplinärer Grenzziehungen bzw. ihrer Lockerung. Hinsichtlich des Prozesses der Wissensintegration, bleiben die knappen Zeitbu...

Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review

“…86 Joint field trips between researchers and stakeholders and communication on the ground enables learning about local realities and about the knowledge demands of local stakeholders. 80 Working with a communications specialist helps such engagement. 84 on November 3, 2020 by guest.…”

Carbon-optimised land management strategies for southern Amazonia

“…The authors demonstrate how the different disciplines were interwoven within the projects and which conflicts, but also new insights arose from the collaboration, especially between natural science and social disciplines. Schönenberg et al (2017) illustrate furthermore how stakeholder involvement from the very first beginning of the research activities determined content and direction of the research and how results were continuously played back to the stakeholders, who reflected upon the consequences for practical application. The art of finding the crucial deciders and actors for such an approach is a research on its own.…”

“…Together with biographic research and institutional research (e.g. actor constellation) along the BR-163, qualitative data was gathered which was used for scenario development, along with regional and local expert knowledge for the southern Amazon region (Schönenberg et al 2017). These narratives were later translated into quantitative parameters to be used for LUC and impact modelling Schaldach et al 2018) with the development of four regional adapted LUC scenarios.…”

“…Both projects followed an inter-and transdisciplinary research strategy (Schönenberg et al 2017). The authors demonstrate how the different disciplines were interwoven within the projects and which conflicts, but also new insights arose from the collaboration, especially between natural science and social disciplines.…”

Assessing the effects of agricultural intensification on natural habitats and biodiversity in Southern Amazonia

“…Each scenario consists of a qualitative part (storyline) that provides a short 146 narrative of the future world and a set of quantitative information that describe the respective 147 main drivers of LULCC (49, 50). The storylines are elaborated by (51). 148 The following paragraphs shortly describe the central assumptions of the scenarios.…”