2017
DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences of healthcare middle managers in developing capacity and capability to manage complexity: a systematic review protocol

Abstract: The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of healthcare middle managers in developing capacity and capability to manage in a leadership role characterized by high complexity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is thus broad knowledge about the roles HMMs are anticipated to fulfill. There is less knowledge about how to acquire these specific competencies, within a complex and changing organization [ 9 , 12 , 15 , 18 ]. Dickson [ 3 ] suggests that present leadership should be understood through complexity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is thus broad knowledge about the roles HMMs are anticipated to fulfill. There is less knowledge about how to acquire these specific competencies, within a complex and changing organization [ 9 , 12 , 15 , 18 ]. Dickson [ 3 ] suggests that present leadership should be understood through complexity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comprehensive systematic review was based on an a priori published, peer-reviewed protocol [12], which implies similarities in the design and methods between this review and the published protocol. Both the review and protocol were inspired by the meta-aggregation guidelines established in the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers’ Manual for qualitative studies [46–48], where both the appraisal and extraction processes before the synthesis added to the critical perspective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregation combined the parts into a whole that was more than the sum of the individual results, which is analogous to a meta-analysis. Based on the a priori published, peer-reviewed protocol [12], the method involved a process of seven steps: 1. formulating a PICo question (Participants, phenomena of Interest, Context), 2. developing a search strategy, 3. searching for knowledge, 4. selecting studies, 5. critically appraising studies, 6. extracting and analysing data and 7. synthesizing data [46]. These seven steps were implemented while conducting this review and were followed up through the presentation of the methods and results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations