Experiences of fear of recurrence in patients with sarcoma
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros,
Lorna A. Fern,
Craig Gerrand
et al.
Abstract:Background:
Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is often described as the most distressing consequence of cancer and has a negative impact on quality of life. There have been few investigations into the FCR in patients with sarcomas. We sought to explore the patient's FCR after a sarcoma diagnosis to determine when these fears were presented and the strategies patients used to address these fears.
Methods:
This was a secondary analysis of qualitative semi-s… Show more
“…This concurs with previous literature demonstrating a prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with sarcoma in a fifth to a third of patients [36,37]. We have also identified fear of recurrence as having a significant impact on patients' lives [5], which was higher than reports in other types of cancer [7]. Given the seemingly higher weighting patients place on the emotional impact of sarcoma, and the relatively superficial exploration of this in the literature, this is an area that warrants more detailed investigation.…”
The Sarcoma Assessment Measure (SAM) was developed as a sarcoma-specific patient-reported outcome measure to be used in clinical practice. We have reported in detail how SAM has been developed in collaboration with patients and healthcare professionals. The aim of this paper is to report the preliminary validation of SAM. The 22-item SAM was administered alongside a validated quality of life questionnaire and measure of activities of daily living. Linear modelling was used to build a measure, which had predictive validity in comparison to more established outcome measures. Of the 762 patients who participated in the study, 44.1% identified as male, and participant age ranged from 13-82 years. Clinically, participants presented with a range of soft tissue (82.2%) and bone (21.8%) sarcomas. Our preliminary analysis indicates that SAM accounts for 35% of the Global quality of life scale and 18% of the TESS so psychometrically it overlaps with quality of life and activities of daily living, but also measures distinct concerns. This demonstrates that this measure picks up issues that are important to patients with sarcoma that are not reflected in other measures. We have established the preliminary validity of SAM and believe it has utility as a patient-reported outcome measure both as a research tool and for assessing the impact of symptoms and dysfunction related to sarcoma as part of clinical care. Further validation using a larger and more clinically diverse sample is now needed.
“…This concurs with previous literature demonstrating a prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with sarcoma in a fifth to a third of patients [36,37]. We have also identified fear of recurrence as having a significant impact on patients' lives [5], which was higher than reports in other types of cancer [7]. Given the seemingly higher weighting patients place on the emotional impact of sarcoma, and the relatively superficial exploration of this in the literature, this is an area that warrants more detailed investigation.…”
The Sarcoma Assessment Measure (SAM) was developed as a sarcoma-specific patient-reported outcome measure to be used in clinical practice. We have reported in detail how SAM has been developed in collaboration with patients and healthcare professionals. The aim of this paper is to report the preliminary validation of SAM. The 22-item SAM was administered alongside a validated quality of life questionnaire and measure of activities of daily living. Linear modelling was used to build a measure, which had predictive validity in comparison to more established outcome measures. Of the 762 patients who participated in the study, 44.1% identified as male, and participant age ranged from 13-82 years. Clinically, participants presented with a range of soft tissue (82.2%) and bone (21.8%) sarcomas. Our preliminary analysis indicates that SAM accounts for 35% of the Global quality of life scale and 18% of the TESS so psychometrically it overlaps with quality of life and activities of daily living, but also measures distinct concerns. This demonstrates that this measure picks up issues that are important to patients with sarcoma that are not reflected in other measures. We have established the preliminary validity of SAM and believe it has utility as a patient-reported outcome measure both as a research tool and for assessing the impact of symptoms and dysfunction related to sarcoma as part of clinical care. Further validation using a larger and more clinically diverse sample is now needed.
“…This concurs with previous literature demonstrating a prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with sarcoma in a fifth to a third of patients [ 41 , 42 ]. We have also identified fear of recurrence as having a significant impact on patients’ lives [ 5 ], which was higher than reports in other types of cancer [ 7 ]. Given the seemingly higher weighting patients place on the emotional impact of sarcoma, and the relatively superficial exploration of this in the literature, this is an area that warrants more detailed investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high risk of developing metastases and recurrence has resulted in treatment pathways in many countries, including the United Kingdom (UK), to comprise annual follow-up often accompanied with a scan. Repeated hospital attendances have a significant impact on patients’ emotional well-being [ 5 ], as these require patients to revisit the experiences they had at diagnosis [ 6 ]. For this and other reasons, fears of sarcoma recurrence are common [ 7 ].…”
The Sarcoma Assessment Measure (SAM) was developed as a sarcoma-specific patient-reported outcome measure to be used in clinical practice. We have reported in detail how SAM has been developed in collaboration with patients and healthcare professionals. The aim of this paper is to report the preliminary validation of SAM. The 22-item SAM was administered alongside a validated quality of life questionnaire and measure of activities of daily living. Linear modelling was used to build a measure, which had predictive validity in comparison to more established outcome measures. Of the 762 patients who participated in the study, 44.1% identified as male, and participant age ranged from 13 to 82 years. Clinically, participants presented with a range of soft tissue (82.2%) and bone (21.8%) sarcomas. Our preliminary analysis indicates that SAM accounts for 35% of the global quality of life scale and 18% of the Toronto Extremity Salvage Scale (TESS); so psychometrically, it overlaps with quality of life and activities of daily living, but also measures distinct concerns. This demonstrates that this measure picks up issues that are important to patients with sarcoma that are not reflected in other measures. We have established the preliminary validity of SAM and believe it has utility as a patient-reported outcome measure both as a research tool and for assessing the impact of symptoms and dysfunction related to sarcoma as part of clinical care. Further validation using a larger and more clinically diverse sample is now needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.