Experiences of ‘Community’ in a Gated Residential Estate

Abstract

Gated residential estates have become common features of the landscapes of cities around the world. The proliferation of these estates has attracted significant critical attention from urban scholars who have focused in particular on their contribution to urban segregation. Many commentators also question the possibility and existence of the neighbourhood‐based community that is promised to potential residents by estates developers. They argue that it cannot be delivered primarily because meaningful community does not form in circumstances of privatism. In this paper, we examine what community means to the residents of Macquarie Links, a gated residential estate in the Australian city of Sydney. To this end, the paper traces the interplay of contradictions that define the expectation and experience of community and argues that rather than being in conflict, the experience of community for many in this gated estate is actually underpinned by the structures of private governance that define the estate. In other words, not only is community said to exist in this neighbourhood, but also it is not homogeneity and everyday neighbouring that are pivotal but the governance structure of the estate.

Constructing exclusive student communities: The rise of “superior” student accommodation and new geographies of exclusion

“…As noted above, this creates many similarities to the upmarket residential communities that form part of the wider private housing market, such as gated communities, especially as many of these actively sell themselves as a “community” and that this forms part of the markers of distinction from other forms of housing (Kenna & Stevenson, 2013). Global property management companies deploy notions like “community” to highlight the different experience available within these developments.…”

Towards better recognising ‘community’ in multi-owned property law and living

“…Soft learning from findings reported allow for rich(er) insights into the socio-legal issues that face residents in their daily lives and the associated performative elements of harmonious MOP living. Gathering evidence can build on existing findings in the form of interviews with MOP stakeholders, gauging views from social media tools like Facebook pages and condo blogs (Kern, 2015) and group metropolitan discussion forums (Dowling et al, 2010;Kenna and Stevenson, 2013). This article raises awareness for key MOP issues and the importance of engaging MOP communities in transparently and democratically realising their desires and needs.…”

Recognising ‘community’ in condo law and living: hard lessons and soft learning from Melbourne and Toronto

“…Gathering evidence can build on existing findings in the form of interviews with MOP stakeholders, gauging views from social media tools (like Facebook pages and condo blogs (Kern, 2015), and group metropolitan discussion forums (Dowling, Atkinson, & McGuirk, 2010;Kenna & Stevenson, 2013). This article raises awareness for key MOP issues and the importance of engaging MOP communities in transparently and democratically realizing their desires and needs.…”