2011
DOI: 10.1109/mc.2011.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences inside the Ubiquitous Oulu Smart City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By using strategic urban planning, the municipal administration and the other funding partners have managed the complexity of smart city strategies by effectively combining the importance of new ICT infrastructures and digital services (Dirks and Keeling 2009;Gil-Castineira et al 2011;Schaffers et al 2011) with many other non-technological critical factors that are widely discussed in smart city research. For example: leadership and political commitment (Alawadhi et al 2012;Chourabi et al 2012;Hill et al 2011); governance and funding capability (Washburn et al 2010); coordination, sponsorship, and support across departments (Naphade et al 2011); collaboration between stakeholders and organizations across multiple sectors (Beck 2011;Paskaleva 2009); innovative business and operating models (Belissent et al 2010;Webb et al 2011); long-term vision, performance metrics and commitment from the top (Moss Kanter and Litow 2009); the capability to connect short-term ICT-based projects and initiatives to real local needs , and the benefits from "the enormous innovative potential of grass-roots efforts" (Ratti and Townsend 2011), avoiding the risks of an excessively top-down approach Deakin and Al Wear 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using strategic urban planning, the municipal administration and the other funding partners have managed the complexity of smart city strategies by effectively combining the importance of new ICT infrastructures and digital services (Dirks and Keeling 2009;Gil-Castineira et al 2011;Schaffers et al 2011) with many other non-technological critical factors that are widely discussed in smart city research. For example: leadership and political commitment (Alawadhi et al 2012;Chourabi et al 2012;Hill et al 2011); governance and funding capability (Washburn et al 2010); coordination, sponsorship, and support across departments (Naphade et al 2011); collaboration between stakeholders and organizations across multiple sectors (Beck 2011;Paskaleva 2009); innovative business and operating models (Belissent et al 2010;Webb et al 2011); long-term vision, performance metrics and commitment from the top (Moss Kanter and Litow 2009); the capability to connect short-term ICT-based projects and initiatives to real local needs , and the benefits from "the enormous innovative potential of grass-roots efforts" (Ratti and Townsend 2011), avoiding the risks of an excessively top-down approach Deakin and Al Wear 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oulu is another example for the employment of ICT technologies [22] to enhance efficiency and well-being in the city. In [23], some of the experiences implemented in this city are presented. However, they are focused on specific verticals and there is a lack of a common platform behind all of them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the few examples is Smart Santander [3], a platform that serves as testbed to conduct experiments and test smart city applications, covering more than 1000 sensors. Gil et al report experiences from their deployment of the panOULU wireless network and a corresponding middleware that should enhance communication between citizens and the government [4]. Hielkema et al focus on developing mobile applications and services utilizing open data from municipal organizations in the Helsinki region [5].…”
Section: International Conference On Recent Advances In Computer Systmentioning
confidence: 99%