2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-1970(03)00045-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences from sensor tests and evaluation of sensor performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the meantime, physical models such as dynamic stochastic process signal, complicated random process signal, and complicated noise come. Now existing online validation or self-test method typically focuses on following fields: the first are embedded processors and non-core components online software test SBST (software-based self test technology), using functional and structural test methods to cover with static faults, slightly dynamic faults and so on [11][12][13][14][15][16]; the second is automated sensor self-validation algorithm, using approximate reasoning techniques such as fuzzy logic to process the sensor measurement in industry harsh environment (normally slowly change signal, such as temperature) and make it have high confidence before using these test data [17][18][19]. The third is redundancy online covalidation method, which is one of the principal ways against the negative effects of random failures; however, as systems age, the likelihood of simultaneous failures of redundant safety systems becomes more compelling [20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: The Challenge Of Online Validation Methods For Wirelessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, physical models such as dynamic stochastic process signal, complicated random process signal, and complicated noise come. Now existing online validation or self-test method typically focuses on following fields: the first are embedded processors and non-core components online software test SBST (software-based self test technology), using functional and structural test methods to cover with static faults, slightly dynamic faults and so on [11][12][13][14][15][16]; the second is automated sensor self-validation algorithm, using approximate reasoning techniques such as fuzzy logic to process the sensor measurement in industry harsh environment (normally slowly change signal, such as temperature) and make it have high confidence before using these test data [17][18][19]. The third is redundancy online covalidation method, which is one of the principal ways against the negative effects of random failures; however, as systems age, the likelihood of simultaneous failures of redundant safety systems becomes more compelling [20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: The Challenge Of Online Validation Methods For Wirelessmentioning
confidence: 99%