Experiences and wishes of women regarding systemic aspects of midwifery care in Germany: a qualitative study with focus groups

Abstract

BackgroundKnowledge of pregnant women’s and mothers’ viewpoints on midwifery care is crucial for its appropriate delivery and research. In Germany, comprehensive research to more fully understand women’s needs in pregnancy, labour, birth and the postpartum period until weaning is lacking. International studies provide some knowledge of women’s expectations, their choices, and subjective criteria indicating good midwifery care.MethodsThis study explores pregnant women’s and mothers’ experiences, needs and wishes regarding systemic aspects of midwifery care (access, availability, choices, model of midwifery care; maternity care in the healthcare system). 50 women participated in 10 focus groups in 5 states of Germany. The groups were heterogeneous with regard to age, parity, model of maternity care used, and rating of satisfaction. Women with limited educational years (n = 9) were personally contacted by midwives and reached by social media. Also, mothers living in a mother-child home (n = 6) or attending a peer group for grieving parents (n = 5) were included. The digitally documented focus groups were systematically analysed in an itinerary hermeneutic manner.ResultsThree themes were identified: (a) Knowledge or lack of awareness of midwifery care, (b) availability of and access to midwives, and (c) midwifery care in the healthcare system. Theme (a) entails the scope of midwifery care and the midwife’s competence, but also a lack of information, inconsistent counselling, and difficulty identifying midwives. Theme (b) encompasses aspects such as the availability, accessibility and selection of a midwife, the effort involved in looking for a midwife, the challenge of transition points, and family midwives. Theme (c) relates interprofessional cooperation, gaps/inadequacies of care during latency phase, alternative models of care, and the importance of family and peer groups for women.ConclusionsMidwifery care and research in Germany must address the issue of imparting relevant information about midwifery services. Interprofessional cooperation and management of transition points ought to be improved in the interests of the women concerned. Moreover, the quality of antenatal classes, support during latency phase, and intrapartum care in hospitals need to be addressed. Lastly, the special needs of vulnerable women in midwifery care must become a major focus in Germany.

Understanding the Experiences and Needs of Migrant Women Affected by Female Genital Mutilation Using Maternity Services in Australia

“…Most women in our study reported different types of FGM-related trauma, which affected their overall quality of life. Women expected health care providers to be responsive to their psychological, emotional and socio-cultural needs as found in other studies [54]. The central philosophy that underpins high-quality maternity care does not only involve a focus on physical health but also emotional well-being and includes quality of life issues [55].…”

Effects of the birthing room environment on vaginal births and client-centred outcomes for women at term planning a vaginal birth: BE-UP, a multicentre randomised controlled trial

“…In particular, women in labour expect continuity of care, choice and control [ 25 ]. They also expect emotional support from their partner or companion, and that midwives will facilitate their active involvement in care [ 26 ]. A study focussing on birthing beds revealed that in developed countries, the birthing bed is culturally important in terms of the safety of maternity care.…”

Information on, knowledge and utilisation of support services during pregnancy and after childbirth: cross-sectional analyses of predictors using data from the KUNO-Kids health study

“…With regard to the latter a focus group with pregnant women and mothers revealed that the knowledge about specific offers and competences of midwives is scarce and that access to and availability of midwives can be limited in Germany. 9 …”

“… 3 Women’s difficulties in accessing antenatal and postnatal care were also described by qualitative studies. 9 13 …”

“…Different approaches which strengthen the continuity of care or even foster integrated care have been proposed. 21 22 While many studies from Germany and other countries with fragmented health services unravelled that mothers prefer continuous and coordinated care, 9 23 24 such approaches have not yet been fully implemented in Germany. They would require a reorientation of health and social services and build on the local and regional infrastructures.…”