1990
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91125-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience with the EndoPap device for the cytologic detection of uterine cancer and its precursors: A comparison of the EndoPap with fractional curettage or hysterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analogously, in 2005 Tsuda et al documented that the prevalence of endometrial disease in asymptomatic and symptomatic women whit thickened endometrium was 2.3% and 21%. 17 Regarding traditional endometrial cytology, despite several encouraging results have been reported with sensibility and specificity reaching 96%, [20][21][22][23][24] its diffusion has been hampered because of technical and diagnostic difficulties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogously, in 2005 Tsuda et al documented that the prevalence of endometrial disease in asymptomatic and symptomatic women whit thickened endometrium was 2.3% and 21%. 17 Regarding traditional endometrial cytology, despite several encouraging results have been reported with sensibility and specificity reaching 96%, [20][21][22][23][24] its diffusion has been hampered because of technical and diagnostic difficulties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found the sensitivity of Suresample ™ to be 84%, which is lower than that of the Pipelle ® device, as mentioned above. In the present study, the inadequate sample (no specimen obtained or insufficient specimen for adequate assessment for histological or cytological diagnosis) at the outpatient examination was regarded as 'negative' for the calculation of the sensitivity, in contrast to some previous studies where inadequate diagnoses were excluded from the calculations [4,8,[10][11][12]. Had we calculated sensitivity by excluding inadequate samples, the sensitivity of Suresample ™ for detecting endometrial carcinoma would be 91%, which is similar to the values reported in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, no patient with carcinoma was falsely diagnosed as having a normal endometrium by outpatient tissue biopsy. Other reports have showed that the sensitivity of cytologic examination for diagnosing endometrial carcinoma is 74.1-100% [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. One study evaluated and compared the accuracy of sampling using Endopap ® and Pipelle ® for diagnosing postmenopausal disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations