1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6665(20)31015-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience with Rast-Based Immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a simpler means of accomplishing this, serum fungal sIgG and sIgE can be measured by radioallergosorbent test (RAST). In vitro testing via modified RAST is an accepted standard in screening and diagnosing inhalant allergy, including molds 13–15 . Unfortunately, there have been no controlled studies to examine the diagnostic efficacy of these values for AFS.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a simpler means of accomplishing this, serum fungal sIgG and sIgE can be measured by radioallergosorbent test (RAST). In vitro testing via modified RAST is an accepted standard in screening and diagnosing inhalant allergy, including molds 13–15 . Unfortunately, there have been no controlled studies to examine the diagnostic efficacy of these values for AFS.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro testing via modified RAST is an accepted standard in screening and diagnosing inhalant allergy, including molds. [13][14][15] Unfortunately, there have been no controlled studies to examine the diagnostic efficacy of these values for AFS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro tests have the added advantage of convenience but are otherwise comparable with the in vivo tests. A discussion of the evolution of in vitro tests and a comparison with in vivo tests has been published 46 …”
Section: Allergy Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discussion of the evolution of in vitro tests and a comparison with in vivo tests has been published. 46 All four testing methods are sensitive and safe. The in vivo tests are safe because they start testing with a low screening allergen dose, whereas the in vitro tests are safe because only drawing of a blood sample is required.…”
Section: Allergy Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, it is also used in screening for immunity, allergens in the food industry, or molecular biology laboratories. A few variants of the RIA method are also employed that enlarge the range of applications such as immunoradiometric assay (IRMA), radioallergosorbent test (RAST), and Farr assay (dsDNA-Ab RIA) which are employed for the detection of anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies in autoimmune diseases (Boguszewska et al 2019 ; Smeenk et al 1991 , 1990 ; Derksen et al 2002 ; Fadal 1992 ; Miles 1975 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%